Employment Discrimination Economic Damages Expert in Hawaii

By Christopher Skerritt, M.Ed., MBA, Chief of Economic Services · Published · Reviewed

KW Economics prepares economic damages analyses for employment discrimination cases venued in Hawaii: the components the loss claim consists of, the records that drive them, and a present value built to Hawaii's damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.

An employment discrimination economic claim measures the gap between the compensation the employee would have received absent the adverse action and the compensation actually received, as back pay, front pay, and lost benefits net of mitigation. Read the full employment discrimination analysis guide.

Hawaii courts and expert standards

Hawaii courts ask whether an expert opinion is relevant and reliable and whether it will help the jury, treating the reliability factors the federal courts use as helpful rather than required and not insisting on general acceptance; the witness is qualified by training and experience. An economic damages report is examined on whether its assumptions have a published basis and fit the record.

Where these cases are heard

Highest court: Hawaii Supreme Court. Federal venues: D. Haw. Court system: courts.state.hi.us.

Damages framework

Hawaii reduces a negligence-based award by the plaintiff's share of fault and bars recovery once that share exceeds the combined fault of the defendants. Prejudgment interest is discretionary, so the report separates past from future amounts and supplies the schedule the court would need to award it. Economic damages are not subject to a general statutory limit outside specific statutory claims.

How the analysis is built

The same four steps apply to an employment discrimination case venued in Hawaii; the damages framework above decides which components enter the total.

  1. Reconstruct the but-for compensation path from the employee's history and the employer's pay practices, including raises, bonus patterns, and benefit accruals.
  2. Compare that path with actual post-action earnings year by year, crediting mitigation from the employee's records or from local wage and unemployment duration data.
  3. Project front pay over the period the record supports for reaching comparable employment, with the loss shown at alternative durations.
  4. Separate back pay, front pay, and benefits, discount the future amounts to present value, and supply the schedule counsel needs for prejudgment interest.

Attorney guides for employment discrimination cases

Other case types in Hawaii

Frequently asked: employment discrimination cases in Hawaii

Which Hawaii courts hear employment discrimination cases?

Employment Discrimination cases venued in Hawaii are heard in the Circuit Court (General jurisdiction; larger civil cases, felonies, family court division). Final appeals run to the Hawaii Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii.

How does Hawaii's damages framework shape the economic analysis?

Hawaii reduces a negligence-based award by the plaintiff's share of fault and bars recovery once that share exceeds the combined fault of the defendants. Prejudgment interest is discretionary, so the report separates past from future amounts and supplies the schedule the court would need to award it. Economic damages are not subject to a general statutory limit outside specific statutory claims. Hawaii courts ask whether an expert opinion is relevant and reliable and whether it will help the jury, treating the reliability factors the federal courts use as helpful rather than required and not insisting on general acceptance; the witness is qualified by training and experience. An economic damages report is examined on whether its assumptions have a published basis and fit the record.

More questions about employment discrimination analysis

References

Request a consultation on employment discrimination cases in Hawaii or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.