KW Economics prepares economic damages analyses for employment discrimination cases venued in Mississippi: the components the loss claim consists of, the records that drive them, and a present value built to Mississippi's damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
An employment discrimination economic claim measures the gap between the compensation the employee would have received absent the adverse action and the compensation actually received, as back pay, front pay, and lost benefits net of mitigation. Read the full employment discrimination analysis guide.
Mississippi trial judges act as gatekeepers for expert testimony and ask whether the economist is qualified by training and experience, whether the method is reliable and accepted in the profession, and whether it was applied reliably to the facts of the case. An economic damages report is written to that inquiry, with each input traced to the record and each data series named.
Highest court: Mississippi Supreme Court. Federal venues: N.D. Miss., S.D. Miss. Court system: courts.ms.gov.
Mississippi applies pure comparative fault in a negligence-based claim, reducing the award in proportion to the plaintiff's share. Prejudgment interest is available on a liquidated sum and generally not on unliquidated tort damages. A statutory limit applies to noneconomic damages while economic damages are unlimited, so the economist's figure enters the case at its full present value, with the liquidated components identified separately.
The same four steps apply to an employment discrimination case venued in Mississippi; the damages framework above decides which components enter the total.
Employment Discrimination cases venued in Mississippi are heard in the Circuit Court (General jurisdiction; civil cases above the justice court threshold, felonies) and the County Court (Exists in more populous counties; mid-sized civil cases). Final appeals run to the Mississippi Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the United States District Courts for the Northern District of Mississippi and Southern District of Mississippi.
Mississippi applies pure comparative fault in a negligence-based claim, reducing the award in proportion to the plaintiff's share. Prejudgment interest is available on a liquidated sum and generally not on unliquidated tort damages. A statutory limit applies to noneconomic damages while economic damages are unlimited, so the economist's figure enters the case at its full present value, with the liquidated components identified separately. Mississippi trial judges act as gatekeepers for expert testimony and ask whether the economist is qualified by training and experience, whether the method is reliable and accepted in the profession, and whether it was applied reliably to the facts of the case. An economic damages report is written to that inquiry, with each input traced to the record and each data series named.
Request a consultation on employment discrimination cases in Mississippi or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.