Intellectual Property Infringement Economic Damages Expert in Idaho

By Christopher Skerritt, M.Ed., MBA, Chief of Economic Services · Published

KW Economics prepares economic damages analyses for intellectual property infringement cases involving Idaho: the measure each patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret claim carries, the sales, cost, and license records that drive it, and a report built for the federal courts, which alone hear patent and copyright claims, and for the Idaho courts that hear claims under Idaho law. Plaintiff and defense.

An intellectual property infringement claim measures what the unauthorized use of a patent, trademark, copyright, or trade secret cost the owner or gained the user, under the measure each statute provides, apportioned to the protected right and built from both sides' sales, cost, and license records. Read the full intellectual property infringement analysis guide.

Idaho courts and expert standards

In the federal district courts, which hear patent and copyright infringement claims between private parties, damages testimony is tested under the federal rules of evidence: whether the expert is qualified, whether the testimony rests on sufficient facts or data, and whether reliable methods were reliably applied to the facts of the case, with the proponent showing each is more likely than not. Claims heard in Idaho's own courts are tested under the standard those courts apply. Idaho courts ask whether the economist is qualified by training and experience and whether the opinion rests on a reliable basis, examining the facts and method behind it without adopting the federal reliability test outright. An intellectual property damages report meets each of these inquiries by tying every royalty input, apportionment step, and sales figure to the record or to another expert's stated opinion.

Where these cases are heard

Highest court: Idaho Supreme Court. Federal venues: D. Idaho. Court system: isc.idaho.gov.

Damages framework

Patent, copyright, and trademark damages are set by federal statute: a reasonable royalty at least, and lost profits where they are proven, for a patent, with recovery limited to six years before suit and, for unmarked products, to the period after notice; the defendant's profits, the owner's actual damages, and the costs of the action for a trademark; and actual damages and the infringer's profits for a copyright, or statutory damages the owner elects instead where the work was registered in time, before the infringement began or within three months after first publication. Those measures do not change with the state, though the regional circuit's decisions govern how the copyright and trademark measures are applied. A trade secret claim can be brought under the federal statute, and most states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands have also enacted a version of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act; Idaho's own law can govern the contract and license claims, whether they are brought with an infringement claim or on their own, and counsel confirms which trade secret law applies and the measures it allows.

How the analysis is built

The same four steps apply to an intellectual property infringement case involving Idaho; the statute behind each claim, set out above, decides which measures enter the total.

  1. Identify the rights asserted, the accused products, and the recoverable period, applying the limitation, notice, and protection periods each claim carries.
  2. Build the royalty base and the infringing sales from the accused party's sales, pricing, and cost records, and apportion them to the patented feature, the protected work or mark, or the trade secret.
  3. Measure each available remedy: the reasonable royalty from comparable licenses, the profit the right made possible, and the user's alternatives; lost profits from the market and the owner's capacity; and the infringer's profits with its costs tested.
  4. Remove any overlap between the measures, add prejudgment interest on the basis the court adopts, and show how the result moves under the opposing base, licenses, and alternatives.

Attorney guides for intellectual property infringement cases

Services for intellectual property infringement cases in Idaho

Other case types in Idaho

Frequently asked: intellectual property infringement cases in Idaho

Which courts hear an intellectual property infringement case involving Idaho?

Patent and copyright claims arise under federal law that only the federal courts may hear: a case filed in Idaho is heard in the United States District Court for the District of Idaho, a case involving a business based in Idaho may be filed in another district where venue lies, and a claim against the United States goes to the Court of Federal Claims; trademark and trade secret claims can be filed in federal court or in Idaho's own courts. An appeal in a case with a claim or compulsory counterclaim under the patent laws goes to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and an appeal in any other case from the district court to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Claims under Idaho law, such as trade secret misappropriation, unfair competition, and disputes over royalties owed under a license, are usually heard with the infringement claim in federal court when they are joined with a patent or copyright claim, and can be heard there on their own where the parties' diverse citizenship brings them within federal jurisdiction; otherwise they are heard in the District Court (General jurisdiction; larger civil cases, felonies, domestic relations, probate), with final appeals to the Idaho Supreme Court.

Which damages rules apply to an intellectual property claim involving Idaho?

Patent, copyright, and trademark damages are set by federal statute: a reasonable royalty at least, and lost profits where they are proven, for a patent, with recovery limited to six years before suit and, for unmarked products, to the period after notice; the defendant's profits, the owner's actual damages, and the costs of the action for a trademark; and actual damages and the infringer's profits for a copyright, or statutory damages the owner elects instead where the work was registered in time, before the infringement began or within three months after first publication. Those measures do not change with the state, though the regional circuit's decisions govern how the copyright and trademark measures are applied. A trade secret claim can be brought under the federal statute, and most states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands have also enacted a version of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act; Idaho's own law can govern the contract and license claims, whether they are brought with an infringement claim or on their own, and counsel confirms which trade secret law applies and the measures it allows. In the federal district courts, which hear patent and copyright infringement claims between private parties, damages testimony is tested under the federal rules of evidence: whether the expert is qualified, whether the testimony rests on sufficient facts or data, and whether reliable methods were reliably applied to the facts of the case, with the proponent showing each is more likely than not. Claims heard in Idaho's own courts are tested under the standard those courts apply. Idaho courts ask whether the economist is qualified by training and experience and whether the opinion rests on a reliable basis, examining the facts and method behind it without adopting the federal reliability test outright. An intellectual property damages report meets each of these inquiries by tying every royalty input, apportionment step, and sales figure to the record or to another expert's stated opinion.

More questions about intellectual property infringement analysis

References

Request a consultation on intellectual property infringement cases in Idaho or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.