Motor Vehicle Accident Economic Damages Expert in Washington

By Christopher Skerritt, M.Ed., MBA, Chief of Economic Services · Published · Reviewed

KW Economics prepares economic damages analyses for motor vehicle accident cases venued in Washington: the components the loss claim consists of, the records that drive them, and a present value built to Washington's damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.

A motor vehicle accident economic claim ranges from a documented period of lost pay to lifetime earnings, household services, and care losses after a catastrophic crash, and the analysis is scaled to the injury the record describes. Read the full motor vehicle accident analysis guide.

Washington courts and expert standards

Washington courts ask whether the methodology behind an expert opinion is generally accepted in the relevant professional community and whether the economist is qualified by training and experience to apply it, leaving disputes over the inputs to cross-examination. The methods of forensic economics are published and long used, so the examination of a damages report usually turns on its assumptions and their support in the record.

Where these cases are heard

Highest court: Washington Supreme Court. Federal venues: W.D. Wash., E.D. Wash. Court system: courts.wa.gov.

Outside the civil courts, wage-loss disputes in workers' compensation matters proceed before the Washington Department of Labor and Industries.

Damages framework

Washington pairs a wrongful death action for the beneficiaries' pecuniary loss, which was broadened in recent years to reach more family members, with a general survival action in which the estate recovers the decedent's economic losses, including net future earnings, and a limited survival claim for the decedent's own pre-death suffering. Pure comparative fault reduces the award in proportion, the collateral source rule applies outside medical malpractice where evidence of collateral payments is admissible, statutory limits on noneconomic damages have been held unconstitutional, and prejudgment interest is generally limited to liquidated sums.

How the analysis is built

The same four steps apply to a motor vehicle accident case venued in Washington; the damages framework above decides which components enter the total.

  1. Document the earnings history, the date the person left work, and any return to work at full or reduced capacity.
  2. Project the but-for earnings over a worklife expectancy with a stated wage growth rate and compare it with the post-injury path.
  3. Value fringe benefits from plan documents or published employer cost data, household services from time-use data, and future care from the life care plan.
  4. Discount each stream to present value at a stated rate and present the alternative scenarios where the return-to-work date or capacity is disputed.

Attorney guides for motor vehicle accident cases

Other case types in Washington

Frequently asked: motor vehicle accident cases in Washington

Which Washington courts hear motor vehicle accident cases?

Motor Vehicle Accident cases venued in Washington are heard in the Superior Court (General jurisdiction; one in each of 39 counties; all civil, criminal, and domestic matters). Final appeals run to the Washington Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the United States District Courts for the Western District of Washington and Eastern District of Washington.

How does Washington's damages framework shape the economic analysis?

Washington pairs a wrongful death action for the beneficiaries' pecuniary loss, which was broadened in recent years to reach more family members, with a general survival action in which the estate recovers the decedent's economic losses, including net future earnings, and a limited survival claim for the decedent's own pre-death suffering. Pure comparative fault reduces the award in proportion, the collateral source rule applies outside medical malpractice where evidence of collateral payments is admissible, statutory limits on noneconomic damages have been held unconstitutional, and prejudgment interest is generally limited to liquidated sums. Washington courts ask whether the methodology behind an expert opinion is generally accepted in the relevant professional community and whether the economist is qualified by training and experience to apply it, leaving disputes over the inputs to cross-examination. The methods of forensic economics are published and long used, so the examination of a damages report usually turns on its assumptions and their support in the record.

More questions about motor vehicle accident analysis

References

Request a consultation on motor vehicle accident cases in Washington or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.