Traumatic Brain Injury Economic Damages Expert in Minnesota

By Christopher Skerritt, M.Ed., MBA, Chief of Economic Services · Published · Reviewed

KW Economics prepares economic damages analyses for traumatic brain injury cases venued in Minnesota: the components the loss claim consists of, the records that drive them, and a present value built to Minnesota's damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.

A traumatic brain injury economic claim measures the earnings, benefits, and household contributions the injury has taken away and reduces the care plan to present value, with the supervision hours and the residual work capacity stated so they can be tested. Read the full traumatic brain injury analysis guide.

Minnesota courts and expert standards

Minnesota courts ask whether a method is generally accepted in the relevant professional community and whether it was reliably applied in the particular case, with the witness qualified by training and experience. The published methods of forensic economics meet the first question, so the examination of a damages report usually turns on its inputs and their support in the record.

Where these cases are heard

Highest court: Minnesota Supreme Court. Federal venues: D. Minn. Court system: mncourts.gov.

Outside the civil courts, wage-loss disputes in workers' compensation matters proceed before the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, Workers' Compensation Division.

Damages framework

Minnesota's wrongful death action is brought by a trustee for the pecuniary loss to the surviving spouse and next of kin, a measure the courts read to include the value of the decedent's counsel, guidance, and aid, and a personal injury claim survives to the estate only when the death was caused by something other than the injury. Recovery is barred once the plaintiff's fault exceeds the defendant's, awards are reduced after verdict by collateral-source payments except where a subrogation right exists and offset by the premiums the plaintiff paid for them, and preverdict interest runs from the commencement of the action or a written settlement demand.

How the analysis is built

The same four steps apply to a traumatic brain injury case venued in Minnesota; the damages framework above decides which components enter the total.

  1. Establish the but-for earnings path from the person's history or, for a young person, from occupational data for the path they were on.
  2. Draw the post-injury path from actual earnings and the work-capacity opinions in the record, and measure the earnings gap over the remaining worklife.
  3. Value household services and family supervision from time-use data and local rates, and price the care plan item by item with medical cost growth.
  4. Discount every future stream to present value at a stated rate and show the total under each supervision and work-capacity scenario.

Attorney guides for traumatic brain injury cases

Other case types in Minnesota

Frequently asked: traumatic brain injury cases in Minnesota

Which Minnesota courts hear traumatic brain injury cases?

Traumatic Brain Injury cases venued in Minnesota are heard in the District Court (General jurisdiction; 10 judicial districts; all civil, criminal, family, and probate matters). Final appeals run to the Minnesota Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

How does Minnesota's damages framework shape the economic analysis?

Minnesota's wrongful death action is brought by a trustee for the pecuniary loss to the surviving spouse and next of kin, a measure the courts read to include the value of the decedent's counsel, guidance, and aid, and a personal injury claim survives to the estate only when the death was caused by something other than the injury. Recovery is barred once the plaintiff's fault exceeds the defendant's, awards are reduced after verdict by collateral-source payments except where a subrogation right exists and offset by the premiums the plaintiff paid for them, and preverdict interest runs from the commencement of the action or a written settlement demand. Minnesota courts ask whether a method is generally accepted in the relevant professional community and whether it was reliably applied in the particular case, with the witness qualified by training and experience. The published methods of forensic economics meet the first question, so the examination of a damages report usually turns on its inputs and their support in the record.

More questions about traumatic brain injury analysis

References

Request a consultation on traumatic brain injury cases in Minnesota or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.