Fringe benefits are the part of compensation paid in something other than wages: employer contributions to health insurance and retirement plans, legally required payroll contributions, paid leave, and similar items. The economist values the benefits the person actually received or would have received and adds them to the earnings projection, so that lost compensation is measured as a whole.
Fringe benefits are part of every lost earnings and wrongful death analysis where the person was employed, and of employment damages where a termination ended benefit coverage. They matter most where the employer's contribution to health and retirement plans was large relative to wages, as in public-sector, union, and long-tenure private employment.
A published average benefit rate is a fallback, not a substitute for the person's own plan documents, and applying it to a person who received few benefits overstates the loss. Health insurance is valued at the employer's cost, which is not the same as the cost of replacing coverage individually; the report should say which measure was used and why. Pension losses depend on plan terms and vesting, and a defined benefit plan requires a separate calculation rather than a percentage add-on.
Inclusion of fringe benefits in lost compensation is well established. Challenges typically argue that a benefit was double counted, for example a retirement contribution added to wages that already included it, or that a published rate was applied where plan documents were available. A report that lists each benefit, its source, and its value item by item is positioned to meet those arguments, and the lost earnings guide shows where benefits sit in the calculation.
Practice varies and the report states the approach. Many economists include the employer share of Social Security and Medicare taxes because it funds a benefit the person would have received; others treat it separately. Either way the treatment is disclosed so it can be tested.
Then the but-for benefit stream is small or zero and the report says so. Benefits are valued as the person actually received them, not as an average worker might have.
For a defined contribution plan, as the employer contributions that would have been made plus their expected growth. For a defined benefit plan, as the difference between the pension the person would have received under the but-for career and the pension now expected, discounted to present value from the date each payment would have begun.
Request a consultation on Fringe Benefits Valuation or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.