KW Economics prepares rebuttal analysis for medical malpractice cases venued in Colorado: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to Colorado damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
In a medical malpractice matter the opposing report is tested first on how it defined the but-for path: whether the earnings, care, and life expectancy assumptions reflect the outcome proper care would have produced or assume perfect health, and whether the apportionment between the injury and the underlying condition follows the medical opinions in the record. The economist then checks the earnings base, the life care plan pricing and growth rates, and the discounting, and quantifies the effect of each correction so counsel can see which assumptions carry the number.
Critique of an opposing economic damages, valuation, or forensic accounting report for plaintiff or defense counsel. The review tests the assumptions, data sources, discount rates, worklife and life expectancy inputs, growth rates, mitigation treatment, and arithmetic behind the opposing number, identifies the errors that matter, and quantifies how the conclusion changes when they are corrected. The result supports cross-examination, a rebuttal report, or a motion directed at the reliability of the opinion.
Because the underlying condition often affected work capacity or life expectancy on its own, the apportionment between the injury and the pre-existing condition is usually the most contested assumption and the one that most changes the total. In cases of permanent disability the incremental care costs and the earnings loss are both large and run across a long horizon, and the life expectancy used for each stream is a second point of contention. In delayed-diagnosis cases the loss may be measured as the difference between two outcome paths, each with its own earnings and care profile.
Colorado applies a liberal but reliability-based inquiry: the trial court asks whether the economist's principles are reasonably reliable, whether the witness is qualified to apply them, and whether the testimony will help the jury, without requiring general acceptance. A damages report meets that inquiry by showing the published basis for each assumption and its application to the record.
Highest court: Colorado Supreme Court. Court system: courts.state.co.us.
Federal venues: District of Colorado.
Outside the civil courts, wage-loss disputes in workers' compensation matters proceed before the Colorado Division of Workers' Compensation.
Colorado's wrongful death action is measured by the net pecuniary loss to the heirs plus a limited allowance for grief, while the survival action for the estate excludes the decedent's pain and suffering. Awards are reduced after verdict by collateral-source payments other than benefits the plaintiff paid for by contract, recovery is barred once the plaintiff's fault reaches half, and prejudgment interest on personal injury awards runs from the date the claim accrued.
We issue a rebuttal report where one is disclosed and provide deposition and trial testimony, cross-examination outlines, and support for motions directed at the opinion.
In a medical malpractice matter the opposing report is tested first on how it defined the but-for path: whether the earnings, care, and life expectancy assumptions reflect the outcome proper care would have produced or assume perfect health, and whether the apportionment between the injury and the underlying condition follows the medical opinions in the record. The economist then checks the earnings base, the life care plan pricing and growth rates, and the discounting, and quantifies the effect of each correction so counsel can see which assumptions carry the number.
Colorado applies a liberal but reliability-based inquiry: the trial court asks whether the economist's principles are reasonably reliable, whether the witness is qualified to apply them, and whether the testimony will help the jury, without requiring general acceptance. A damages report meets that inquiry by showing the published basis for each assumption and its application to the record. Medical Malpractice cases venued in Colorado are heard in the District Court (General jurisdiction; larger civil cases, felonies, domestic relations, probate), with final appeals to the Colorado Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the District of Colorado.
Colorado's wrongful death action is measured by the net pecuniary loss to the heirs plus a limited allowance for grief, while the survival action for the estate excludes the decedent's pain and suffering. Awards are reduced after verdict by collateral-source payments other than benefits the plaintiff paid for by contract, recovery is barred once the plaintiff's fault reaches half, and prejudgment interest on personal injury awards runs from the date the claim accrued. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the Colorado rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on Rebuttal or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.