KW Economics prepares rebuttal analysis for partnership and shareholder dispute cases venued in Arkansas: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to Arkansas damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
A valuation report in an owner dispute is tested on the valuation date, the standard of value, the normalizing adjustments, the approaches applied and how they were reconciled, and any discounts or premiums. The economist checks whether the standard matches the claim and the agreement, whether owner compensation and related-party dealings were normalized on market evidence, whether the discount rate and market multiples are supported by their sources, and whether a minority or marketability discount is appropriate under the standard applied. The review quantifies the effect of each correction and shows the value under the alternative standard where the choice is disputed.
Critique of an opposing economic damages, valuation, or forensic accounting report for plaintiff or defense counsel. The review tests the assumptions, data sources, discount rates, worklife and life expectancy inputs, growth rates, mitigation treatment, and arithmetic behind the opposing number, identifies the errors that matter, and quantifies how the conclusion changes when they are corrected. The result supports cross-examination, a rebuttal report, or a motion directed at the reliability of the opinion.
The valuation date and the standard of value control the result: a fair value standard may exclude the minority and marketability discounts that a fair market value standard applies, and the gap between the two can be substantial for a minority interest in a closely held company. Normalizing adjustments to owner compensation and related-party dealings often decide whether the business shows earnings to value at all. Where the claim includes diverted profits, the amount depends on how far back the records permit reconstruction and on whether the business's actual results can be separated from market conditions.
Arkansas trial courts act as gatekeepers and ask whether the economist's method is reliable, whether it has been tested and accepted in the profession, and whether it fits the facts of the case, with qualification resting on training and experience. A report that states its assumptions and cites its data sources answers those questions on its face.
Highest court: Arkansas Supreme Court. Court system: courts.arkansas.gov.
Federal venues: Eastern District of Arkansas, Western District of Arkansas.
Arkansas reduces a negligence-based award by the plaintiff's share of fault and bars recovery only when that share equals or exceeds the defendants', and the state constitution bars limits on the amount recoverable for injury or death. Prejudgment interest is available where the amount of the loss was determinable at the time of the injury, which favors a liquidated contract sum over a projected loss. No general statutory limit applies to economic damages, and the report separates the components that were determinable at the time of the loss from those that had to be projected.
We issue a rebuttal report where one is disclosed and provide deposition and trial testimony, cross-examination outlines, and support for motions directed at the opinion.
A valuation report in an owner dispute is tested on the valuation date, the standard of value, the normalizing adjustments, the approaches applied and how they were reconciled, and any discounts or premiums. The economist checks whether the standard matches the claim and the agreement, whether owner compensation and related-party dealings were normalized on market evidence, whether the discount rate and market multiples are supported by their sources, and whether a minority or marketability discount is appropriate under the standard applied. The review quantifies the effect of each correction and shows the value under the alternative standard where the choice is disputed.
Arkansas trial courts act as gatekeepers and ask whether the economist's method is reliable, whether it has been tested and accepted in the profession, and whether it fits the facts of the case, with qualification resting on training and experience. A report that states its assumptions and cites its data sources answers those questions on its face. Partnership and Shareholder Dispute cases venued in Arkansas are heard in the Circuit Court (General jurisdiction; civil, criminal, domestic, probate, and juvenile matters), with final appeals to the Arkansas Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the Eastern District of Arkansas and Western District of Arkansas.
Arkansas reduces a negligence-based award by the plaintiff's share of fault and bars recovery only when that share equals or exceeds the defendants', and the state constitution bars limits on the amount recoverable for injury or death. Prejudgment interest is available where the amount of the loss was determinable at the time of the injury, which favors a liquidated contract sum over a projected loss. No general statutory limit applies to economic damages, and the report separates the components that were determinable at the time of the loss from those that had to be projected. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the Arkansas rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on Rebuttal or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.