KW Economics prepares rebuttal analysis for product liability cases venued in Michigan: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to Michigan damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
Product liability damages reports often concern claimants without a conventional earnings history, and the review tests how the opposing report built the earnings base for a child, student, homemaker, or retiree, whether the household services and care components rest on the record or on assumptions, and, in a mass tort, whether one method was applied consistently across claimants or adjusted case by case. The economist checks the educational and occupational assumptions, the time-use and replacement wage sources, the life care plan pricing and growth rates, and the discounting, and quantifies the effect of each correction.
Critique of an opposing economic damages, valuation, or forensic accounting report for plaintiff or defense counsel. The review tests the assumptions, data sources, discount rates, worklife and life expectancy inputs, growth rates, mitigation treatment, and arithmetic behind the opposing number, identifies the errors that matter, and quantifies how the conclusion changes when they are corrected. The result supports cross-examination, a rebuttal report, or a motion directed at the reliability of the opinion.
The exposure tracks the injury: burns, amputations, and neurological injuries produce large future earnings and care losses; less severe injuries produce a bounded past loss and limited future treatment. Because product cases often involve children, homemakers, and retirees, the household services and care components frequently outweigh the earnings loss, and the analysis must be built from those components rather than from wage records that do not exist. For fatal injuries the exposure follows the wrongful death structure with the personal consumption deduction as the key assumption.
Michigan courts require the trial judge to act as gatekeeper for expert testimony, asking whether the economist is qualified, whether the opinion rests on sufficient facts and reliable principles and methods, and whether those methods were applied reliably to the case. A damages report meets that inquiry by naming the published source behind every assumption and tying each to the record.
Highest court: Michigan Supreme Court. Court system: courts.michigan.gov.
Federal venues: Eastern District of Michigan, Western District of Michigan.
Outside the civil courts, wage-loss disputes in workers' compensation matters proceed before the Michigan Workers' Disability Compensation Agency.
Michigan's wrongful death act gathers the survival and death claims into a single action: the estate recovers the decedent's conscious pain and suffering and medical and funeral expenses, and the surviving family recovers lost financial support, services, society, and companionship. Awards are reduced after verdict by collateral-source payments other than those subject to a lien, a plaintiff whose fault exceeds half loses noneconomic damages while economic damages are only reduced, the court reduces future damages to present value under a statutory formula, and interest on the judgment runs from the filing of the complaint.
We issue a rebuttal report where one is disclosed and provide deposition and trial testimony, cross-examination outlines, and support for motions directed at the opinion.
The same four steps apply to a product liability case venued in Michigan; the damages framework above decides which components enter the total. Establish the but-for path from the earnings history or, for a child, student, or homemaker, from the educational path, occupational data, or the household work performed. Draw the post-injury path from actual earnings and the work-capacity opinions, and project both paths over the applicable worklife or life expectancy with growth. Value household services from time-use data and local rates, and price future care from the life care plan with category-specific cost growth. Discount every stream to present value at a stated rate and, where there are multiple claimants, apply one documented methodology to each record.
Michigan courts require the trial judge to act as gatekeeper for expert testimony, asking whether the economist is qualified, whether the opinion rests on sufficient facts and reliable principles and methods, and whether those methods were applied reliably to the case. A damages report meets that inquiry by naming the published source behind every assumption and tying each to the record. Product Liability cases venued in Michigan are heard in the Circuit Court (General jurisdiction; larger civil cases, felonies, domestic relations), with final appeals to the Michigan Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the Eastern District of Michigan and Western District of Michigan.
Michigan's wrongful death act gathers the survival and death claims into a single action: the estate recovers the decedent's conscious pain and suffering and medical and funeral expenses, and the surviving family recovers lost financial support, services, society, and companionship. Awards are reduced after verdict by collateral-source payments other than those subject to a lien, a plaintiff whose fault exceeds half loses noneconomic damages while economic damages are only reduced, the court reduces future damages to present value under a statutory formula, and interest on the judgment runs from the filing of the complaint. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the Michigan rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on Rebuttal or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.