KW Economics prepares fraud and tracing analysis for commercial contract dispute cases venued in Hawaii: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to Hawaii damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
A contract dispute can involve a forensic accounting question alongside the damages question: whether revenue was reported as the contract required, whether costs charged to a project were actually incurred, or whether payments went where the contract directed. The economist reconstructs the flow of funds from the ledger, bank records, and third-party documents, compares it with the contract's terms, and quantifies any shortfall or misapplication by period. The findings support the damages analysis and can stand on their own as an accounting of what was paid, received, and retained.
Forensic accounting for embezzlement, misappropriation, and financial statement irregularities. The work reconstructs the flow of funds through bank, ledger, and payment records, traces diverted assets to where they came to rest, quantifies the loss for each scheme identified, and documents the evidence trail so it can support a civil claim, an insurance recovery, or a referral to authorities.
The size of the claim depends on the contract's remaining term, the profit margin the business would have realized, and how much of the lost volume was or could have been replaced. Incremental cost treatment is the usual battleground: whether a given cost would have been avoided when the revenue disappeared changes the margin and therefore the loss. For a new venture or a contract without a performance history, the reasonableness of the projected revenue is the central dispute, and the period over which lost profits are claimed is scrutinized against the contract's terms and the market.
Hawaii courts ask whether an expert opinion is relevant and reliable and whether it will help the jury, treating the reliability factors the federal courts use as helpful rather than required and not insisting on general acceptance; the witness is qualified by training and experience. An economic damages report is examined on whether its assumptions have a published basis and fit the record.
Highest court: Hawaii Supreme Court. Court system: courts.state.hi.us.
Federal venues: District of Hawaii.
Hawaii reduces a negligence-based award by the plaintiff's share of fault and bars recovery once that share exceeds the combined fault of the defendants. Prejudgment interest is discretionary, so the report separates past from future amounts and supplies the schedule the court would need to award it. Economic damages are not subject to a general statutory limit outside specific statutory claims.
We issue the final report and provide deposition and trial testimony, support for insurance or restitution claims, and rebuttal of opposing accounting analyses.
A contract dispute can involve a forensic accounting question alongside the damages question: whether revenue was reported as the contract required, whether costs charged to a project were actually incurred, or whether payments went where the contract directed. The economist reconstructs the flow of funds from the ledger, bank records, and third-party documents, compares it with the contract's terms, and quantifies any shortfall or misapplication by period. The findings support the damages analysis and can stand on their own as an accounting of what was paid, received, and retained.
Hawaii courts ask whether an expert opinion is relevant and reliable and whether it will help the jury, treating the reliability factors the federal courts use as helpful rather than required and not insisting on general acceptance; the witness is qualified by training and experience. An economic damages report is examined on whether its assumptions have a published basis and fit the record. Commercial Contract Dispute cases venued in Hawaii are heard in the Circuit Court (General jurisdiction; larger civil cases, felonies, family court division), with final appeals to the Hawaii Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the District of Hawaii.
Hawaii reduces a negligence-based award by the plaintiff's share of fault and bars recovery once that share exceeds the combined fault of the defendants. Prejudgment interest is discretionary, so the report separates past from future amounts and supplies the schedule the court would need to award it. Economic damages are not subject to a general statutory limit outside specific statutory claims. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the Hawaii rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on Fraud & Tracing or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.