KW Economics prepares life care plan costing for motor vehicle accident cases venued in Arkansas: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to Arkansas damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
After a catastrophic crash the present value of the life care plan can exceed the earnings loss, and the attendant care, equipment, and future surgery items in the plan drive the total. The economist reduces the plan to present value with category-specific medical cost growth over the life expectancy the medical evidence supports, presents the total under alternative care scenarios where the plan offers them, and states every assumption so the valuation can be examined item by item. Because policy limits often frame the practical range, the report shows the plan's present value by category so counsel can evaluate settlement against the components that carry the most weight.
Reduction of a life care plan's line items to a single present value. The plan's items, frequencies, durations, and unit costs are carried forward with medical cost growth appropriate to each category, then discounted over the applicable life expectancy. Plan authorship stays with the life care planner; our role is the economic translation of the plan into a damages figure that reconciles with the plan and can be examined item by item.
In moderate injury the exposure is concentrated in the period out of work and any future surgery or treatment, and the numbers can usually be built directly from the records. Once an injury prevents a return to the prior occupation, the future earnings gap across the remaining worklife becomes the dominant figure, and in catastrophic injury the present value of attendant care and equipment in the life care plan can exceed the earnings loss. Policy limits often frame the practical range, so counsel commonly ask for a report that presents each component separately for settlement evaluation and for trial.
Arkansas trial courts act as gatekeepers and ask whether the economist's method is reliable, whether it has been tested and accepted in the profession, and whether it fits the facts of the case, with qualification resting on training and experience. A report that states its assumptions and cites its data sources answers those questions on its face.
Highest court: Arkansas Supreme Court. Court system: courts.arkansas.gov.
Federal venues: Eastern District of Arkansas, Western District of Arkansas.
Outside the civil courts, wage-loss disputes in workers' compensation matters proceed before the Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission.
Arkansas allows a wrongful death action for the statutory beneficiaries' pecuniary loss and mental anguish alongside a survival action for the estate, and the state constitution bars limits on the amount recoverable for injury or death. Recovery is barred only when the plaintiff's fault equals or exceeds the defendants', the common-law collateral source rule applies, and prejudgment interest is available where the amount of the loss was determinable at the time of the injury.
We issue the final report and provide deposition and trial testimony, rebuttal of opposing present value opinions, and revaluation when the plan is updated.
After a catastrophic crash the present value of the life care plan can exceed the earnings loss, and the attendant care, equipment, and future surgery items in the plan drive the total. The economist reduces the plan to present value with category-specific medical cost growth over the life expectancy the medical evidence supports, presents the total under alternative care scenarios where the plan offers them, and states every assumption so the valuation can be examined item by item. Because policy limits often frame the practical range, the report shows the plan's present value by category so counsel can evaluate settlement against the components that carry the most weight.
Arkansas trial courts act as gatekeepers and ask whether the economist's method is reliable, whether it has been tested and accepted in the profession, and whether it fits the facts of the case, with qualification resting on training and experience. A report that states its assumptions and cites its data sources answers those questions on its face. Motor Vehicle Accident cases venued in Arkansas are heard in the Circuit Court (General jurisdiction; civil, criminal, domestic, probate, and juvenile matters), with final appeals to the Arkansas Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the Eastern District of Arkansas and Western District of Arkansas.
Arkansas allows a wrongful death action for the statutory beneficiaries' pecuniary loss and mental anguish alongside a survival action for the estate, and the state constitution bars limits on the amount recoverable for injury or death. Recovery is barred only when the plaintiff's fault equals or exceeds the defendants', the common-law collateral source rule applies, and prejudgment interest is available where the amount of the loss was determinable at the time of the injury. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the Arkansas rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on Life Care Plan Costing or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.