KW Economics prepares life care plan costing for personal injury cases venued in Washington: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to Washington damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
For a personal injury claim the life care plan supplies the future medical and care items, and the economist's role is the economic translation of those items into a present value that reconciles with the plan. Each item's frequency, duration, and unit cost is carried forward with the medical cost growth appropriate to its category, summed year by year over the applicable life expectancy, and discounted with the rate stated. The result can stand alone or enter an integrated damages report on the same growth, discount, and life expectancy assumptions as the earnings and household services components.
Reduction of a life care plan's line items to a single present value. The plan's items, frequencies, durations, and unit costs are carried forward with medical cost growth appropriate to each category, then discounted over the applicable life expectancy. Plan authorship stays with the life care planner; our role is the economic translation of the plan into a damages figure that reconciles with the plan and can be examined item by item.
Which component dominates depends on the person's age, occupation, and residual capacity. For a young worker who can no longer perform a skilled trade, future earnings loss over a long worklife usually outweighs everything else. For a person who returns to work at reduced hours or lower pay, the loss is the gap between the but-for path and the post-injury path, and the size of that gap is the contested question. Where a life care plan exists, its present value is often the largest single figure in the report, and household services losses can be substantial when the injured person did most of the home's unpaid work.
Washington courts ask whether the methodology behind an expert opinion is generally accepted in the relevant professional community and whether the economist is qualified by training and experience to apply it, leaving disputes over the inputs to cross-examination. The methods of forensic economics are published and long used, so the examination of a damages report usually turns on its assumptions and their support in the record.
Highest court: Washington Supreme Court. Court system: courts.wa.gov.
Federal venues: Western District of Washington, Eastern District of Washington.
Outside the civil courts, wage-loss disputes in workers' compensation matters proceed before the Washington Department of Labor and Industries.
Washington pairs a wrongful death action for the beneficiaries' pecuniary loss, which was broadened in recent years to reach more family members, with a general survival action in which the estate recovers the decedent's economic losses, including net future earnings, and a limited survival claim for the decedent's own pre-death suffering. Pure comparative fault reduces the award in proportion, the collateral source rule applies outside medical malpractice where evidence of collateral payments is admissible, statutory limits on noneconomic damages have been held unconstitutional, and prejudgment interest is generally limited to liquidated sums.
We issue the final report and provide deposition and trial testimony, rebuttal of opposing present value opinions, and revaluation when the plan is updated.
The same four steps apply to a personal injury case venued in Washington; the damages framework above decides which components enter the total. Establish the but-for earnings and fringe benefit base from the tax, wage, benefit, and personnel records, or from occupational data for a career still in training. Project the base over a statistically expected worklife with a stated wage growth rate and compare it with the post-injury path the record supports. Value household services from time-use data and local replacement rates, and price the future care in the life care plan item by item with medical cost growth. Discount every future stream to present value at a stated rate and show the sensitivity of the total to the contested assumptions.
Washington courts ask whether the methodology behind an expert opinion is generally accepted in the relevant professional community and whether the economist is qualified by training and experience to apply it, leaving disputes over the inputs to cross-examination. The methods of forensic economics are published and long used, so the examination of a damages report usually turns on its assumptions and their support in the record. Personal Injury cases venued in Washington are heard in the Superior Court (General jurisdiction; one in each of 39 counties; all civil, criminal, and domestic matters), with final appeals to the Washington Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the Western District of Washington and Eastern District of Washington.
Washington pairs a wrongful death action for the beneficiaries' pecuniary loss, which was broadened in recent years to reach more family members, with a general survival action in which the estate recovers the decedent's economic losses, including net future earnings, and a limited survival claim for the decedent's own pre-death suffering. Pure comparative fault reduces the award in proportion, the collateral source rule applies outside medical malpractice where evidence of collateral payments is admissible, statutory limits on noneconomic damages have been held unconstitutional, and prejudgment interest is generally limited to liquidated sums. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the Washington rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on Life Care Plan Costing or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.