KW Economics prepares lost earnings analysis for personal injury cases venued in California: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to California damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
In a personal injury matter the lost earnings analysis is the core of the economic claim and often its largest component. The economist establishes the but-for earnings base from tax returns, wage statements, and personnel records, projects it over a worklife expectancy with wage growth, and compares it with the post-injury path drawn from actual earnings and the work-capacity opinions in the record. A short absence with a full return to the same job leaves a past loss that can be built from pay records; a permanent restriction that ends the prior occupation opens a future gap that runs across the remaining worklife and is discounted to present value with the rate stated.
Past and future lost earnings and fringe benefits for a person whose injury has removed them from work or reduced what they can earn. The analysis builds from the earnings history, projects the but-for path over the person's expected worklife with wage growth, and discounts the future stream to present value. When the person can still work in a reduced capacity, the loss is framed as diminished earning capacity, with the post-injury path drawn from a vocational opinion or the treating record and offset against the but-for projection.
Which component dominates depends on the person's age, occupation, and residual capacity. For a young worker who can no longer perform a skilled trade, future earnings loss over a long worklife usually outweighs everything else. For a person who returns to work at reduced hours or lower pay, the loss is the gap between the but-for path and the post-injury path, and the size of that gap is the contested question. Where a life care plan exists, its present value is often the largest single figure in the report, and household services losses can be substantial when the injured person did most of the home's unpaid work.
California courts ask whether the reasoning and data behind an expert opinion are sound and whether the opinion rests on matter of a type experts reasonably rely on, reserving a general-acceptance test for novel scientific techniques; the witness is qualified by training and experience. Economic damages testimony is therefore examined on its inputs and logic: whether the worklife, growth, and discount assumptions have a published basis and whether they fit the record.
Highest court: Supreme Court of California. Court system: courts.ca.gov.
Federal venues: Northern District of California, Eastern District of California, Central District of California, Southern District of California.
Outside the civil courts, wage-loss disputes in workers' compensation matters proceed before the California Division of Workers' Compensation.
California pairs a wrongful death action for the heirs' economic and companionship losses with a survival action for the estate's own claims, and past medical expenses are measured by the amounts actually paid or owed rather than by the amounts billed. Pure comparative fault reduces the award in proportion, the collateral source rule applies outside medical malpractice, and prejudgment interest in injury cases turns on the statutory offer-to-compromise procedure rather than accruing as of right.
We issue the final report in disclosure-ready form and provide deposition and trial testimony, rebuttal of opposing economic opinions, and updated calculations as new records arrive.
The same four steps apply to a personal injury case venued in California; the damages framework above decides which components enter the total. Establish the but-for earnings and fringe benefit base from the tax, wage, benefit, and personnel records, or from occupational data for a career still in training. Project the base over a statistically expected worklife with a stated wage growth rate and compare it with the post-injury path the record supports. Value household services from time-use data and local replacement rates, and price the future care in the life care plan item by item with medical cost growth. Discount every future stream to present value at a stated rate and show the sensitivity of the total to the contested assumptions.
California courts ask whether the reasoning and data behind an expert opinion are sound and whether the opinion rests on matter of a type experts reasonably rely on, reserving a general-acceptance test for novel scientific techniques; the witness is qualified by training and experience. Economic damages testimony is therefore examined on its inputs and logic: whether the worklife, growth, and discount assumptions have a published basis and whether they fit the record. Personal Injury cases venued in California are heard in the Superior Court (Unified general jurisdiction trial court in each of 58 counties; handles all civil and criminal matters), with final appeals to the Supreme Court of California. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the Northern District of California, Eastern District of California, Central District of California, and Southern District of California.
California pairs a wrongful death action for the heirs' economic and companionship losses with a survival action for the estate's own claims, and past medical expenses are measured by the amounts actually paid or owed rather than by the amounts billed. Pure comparative fault reduces the award in proportion, the collateral source rule applies outside medical malpractice, and prejudgment interest in injury cases turns on the statutory offer-to-compromise procedure rather than accruing as of right. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the California rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on Lost Earnings or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.