KW Economics prepares lost earnings analysis for product liability cases venued in Indiana: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to Indiana damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
Product liability claims often involve an injured person whose exposure to the product bears no relation to their occupation, so the lost earnings analysis is built from that person's own path rather than from the circumstances of the injury. The economist establishes the but-for earnings base from the earnings history or, for a child, student, or homemaker, from the educational path and occupational earnings data, projects it over the applicable worklife with growth, and sets against it the post-injury path the work-capacity opinions support. In a mass tort setting the same documented method is applied to each claimant's own records so results are consistent in method and individual in result.
Past and future lost earnings and fringe benefits for a person whose injury has removed them from work or reduced what they can earn. The analysis builds from the earnings history, projects the but-for path over the person's expected worklife with wage growth, and discounts the future stream to present value. When the person can still work in a reduced capacity, the loss is framed as diminished earning capacity, with the post-injury path drawn from a vocational opinion or the treating record and offset against the but-for projection.
The exposure tracks the injury: burns, amputations, and neurological injuries produce large future earnings and care losses; less severe injuries produce a bounded past loss and limited future treatment. Because product cases often involve children, homemakers, and retirees, the household services and care components frequently outweigh the earnings loss, and the analysis must be built from those components rather than from wage records that do not exist. For fatal injuries the exposure follows the wrongful death structure with the personal consumption deduction as the key assumption.
Indiana courts require that the principles behind expert scientific testimony be reliable and treat the federal reliability factors as helpful rather than controlling; for economic damages testimony the inquiry is whether the witness is qualified and whether the method and its inputs rest on a sound basis. A report that names its sources and ties each assumption to the record meets that standard.
Highest court: Indiana Supreme Court. Court system: in.gov.
Federal venues: Northern District of Indiana, Southern District of Indiana.
Outside the civil courts, wage-loss disputes in workers' compensation matters proceed before the Worker's Compensation Board of Indiana.
Indiana's wrongful death remedies differ by who died: the general act measures the loss to a spouse or dependents, a separate act covers adults without dependents with limited nonpecuniary recovery, and a child act covers minors, so the economist's role depends on which act applies. Recovery is barred once the plaintiff's fault exceeds half, the jury may hear evidence of collateral-source payments other than insurance the plaintiff or family paid for and governmental benefits, and prejudgment interest in tort turns on a statutory settlement-offer procedure.
We issue the final report in disclosure-ready form and provide deposition and trial testimony, rebuttal of opposing economic opinions, and updated calculations as new records arrive.
Product liability claims often involve an injured person whose exposure to the product bears no relation to their occupation, so the lost earnings analysis is built from that person's own path rather than from the circumstances of the injury. The economist establishes the but-for earnings base from the earnings history or, for a child, student, or homemaker, from the educational path and occupational earnings data, projects it over the applicable worklife with growth, and sets against it the post-injury path the work-capacity opinions support. In a mass tort setting the same documented method is applied to each claimant's own records so results are consistent in method and individual in result.
Indiana courts require that the principles behind expert scientific testimony be reliable and treat the federal reliability factors as helpful rather than controlling; for economic damages testimony the inquiry is whether the witness is qualified and whether the method and its inputs rest on a sound basis. A report that names its sources and ties each assumption to the record meets that standard. Product Liability cases venued in Indiana are heard in the Circuit Court (General jurisdiction; oldest courts in each county) and the Superior Court (General jurisdiction; exists in most counties alongside circuit courts), with final appeals to the Indiana Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the Northern District of Indiana and Southern District of Indiana.
Indiana's wrongful death remedies differ by who died: the general act measures the loss to a spouse or dependents, a separate act covers adults without dependents with limited nonpecuniary recovery, and a child act covers minors, so the economist's role depends on which act applies. Recovery is barred once the plaintiff's fault exceeds half, the jury may hear evidence of collateral-source payments other than insurance the plaintiff or family paid for and governmental benefits, and prejudgment interest in tort turns on a statutory settlement-offer procedure. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the Indiana rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on Lost Earnings or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.