KW Economics prepares lost earnings analysis for traumatic brain injury cases venued in Oregon: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to Oregon damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
Brain injury claims often present a large lost earnings figure because cognitive and behavioral effects can end a career even when physical function returns, and a young claimant's worklife is long. The economist builds the but-for path from the earnings history or, for a young person, from occupational data for the path they were on, and compares it with a post-injury path that may be no competitive work, work only with supports, or work at a lower level. The neuropsychological and work-capacity opinions in the record define that path; the report shows the loss under each opinion when they differ and states how the total moves with residual capacity.
Past and future lost earnings and fringe benefits for a person whose injury has removed them from work or reduced what they can earn. The analysis builds from the earnings history, projects the but-for path over the person's expected worklife with wage growth, and discounts the future stream to present value. When the person can still work in a reduced capacity, the loss is framed as diminished earning capacity, with the post-injury path drawn from a vocational opinion or the treating record and offset against the but-for projection.
Two components usually dominate: future lost earnings across a long worklife for a young person, and the present value of attendant care and supervision when the plan calls for daily hours of paid help. Because the level of supervision and the person's residual work capacity are both matters of expert opinion, the report's total is highly sensitive to those inputs, and the life expectancy used for the care stream is a second source of dispute. Mild injury with persistent symptoms presents a narrower claim built on reduced hours, lost advancement, and periodic treatment.
Oregon courts apply a multi-factor reliability inquiry of their own to expert testimony, asking whether the method is accepted in the profession, whether it has been tested and reviewed, and whether the economist applied it to the facts of the case, with qualification resting on training and experience. A damages report meets that inquiry by showing the published basis for each assumption and its fit with the record.
Highest court: Oregon Supreme Court. Court system: courts.oregon.gov.
Federal venues: District of Oregon.
Outside the civil courts, wage-loss disputes in workers' compensation matters proceed before the Oregon Workers' Compensation Division.
Oregon's wrongful death statute gathers the estate's and the beneficiaries' claims into one action brought by the personal representative: the decedent's pre-death losses and suffering, medical and funeral expenses, the beneficiaries' pecuniary loss, and their loss of society and companionship. Recovery is barred once the plaintiff's fault exceeds the combined fault of the defendants, the court may reduce an award after verdict by collateral-source payments other than insurance the plaintiff purchased, federal benefits, and sources with a reimbursement right, and prejudgment interest is generally not available on unliquidated injury damages.
We issue the final report in disclosure-ready form and provide deposition and trial testimony, rebuttal of opposing economic opinions, and updated calculations as new records arrive.
Brain injury claims often present a large lost earnings figure because cognitive and behavioral effects can end a career even when physical function returns, and a young claimant's worklife is long. The economist builds the but-for path from the earnings history or, for a young person, from occupational data for the path they were on, and compares it with a post-injury path that may be no competitive work, work only with supports, or work at a lower level. The neuropsychological and work-capacity opinions in the record define that path; the report shows the loss under each opinion when they differ and states how the total moves with residual capacity.
Oregon courts apply a multi-factor reliability inquiry of their own to expert testimony, asking whether the method is accepted in the profession, whether it has been tested and reviewed, and whether the economist applied it to the facts of the case, with qualification resting on training and experience. A damages report meets that inquiry by showing the published basis for each assumption and its fit with the record. Traumatic Brain Injury cases venued in Oregon are heard in the Circuit Court (General jurisdiction; 27 judicial districts; civil, criminal, family, and probate matters), with final appeals to the Oregon Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the District of Oregon.
Oregon's wrongful death statute gathers the estate's and the beneficiaries' claims into one action brought by the personal representative: the decedent's pre-death losses and suffering, medical and funeral expenses, the beneficiaries' pecuniary loss, and their loss of society and companionship. Recovery is barred once the plaintiff's fault exceeds the combined fault of the defendants, the court may reduce an award after verdict by collateral-source payments other than insurance the plaintiff purchased, federal benefits, and sources with a reimbursement right, and prejudgment interest is generally not available on unliquidated injury damages. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the Oregon rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on Lost Earnings or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.