Lost profits analysis applied to commercial contract dispute litigation: methodology, deliverables, and case-specific considerations.
In a commercial contract dispute the lost profits analysis reconstructs what the business would have earned had the other party performed: the revenue the contract would have produced less the incremental costs of earning it, over the contract's remaining term or the period the market supports. The economist builds the but-for path from the contract terms, the pre-dispute projections, and the company's history, separates incremental from fixed costs so only the lost margin is claimed, credits mitigation, and discounts future lost profits at a rate that reflects the risk of the earnings stream. Each element of the claim ties to a document so it can be tested independently.
Lost profits and related commercial damages for contract, business-tort, and business-interruption matters. The analysis builds the but-for revenue and cost path from the company's own history, its market, and the terms of the disputed relationship, links each claimed loss to the conduct at issue, addresses mitigation, and reasons through the period of loss so the damages figure answers the causation question as well as the amount.
The claim typically consists of lost profits on the contract itself, measured as the revenue that would have been earned less the costs that would have been incurred to earn it; lost profits on related business that depended on the contract, where the record supports the connection; reliance costs incurred in preparation for performance; and in some matters the diminished value of the business when the breach reduced its ongoing earnings capacity. The drivers are the contract and its performance history, historical financial statements and tax returns, budgets and projections prepared before the dispute, customer and pricing records, and the cost structure that determines what portion of lost revenue would have been profit.
We issue the final report and provide deposition and trial testimony and rebuttal of opposing damages models.
Because whether a cost would have been avoided when the revenue disappeared changes the margin and therefore the loss. The economist classifies each cost from the general ledger and the company's cost behavior, states the classification, and shows the effect of treating contested costs the other way.
It is harder, and the report says so. The projection is built from the business plan, comparable businesses, the market's size and growth, and any performance before the breach, and it is presented with the uncertainty made explicit rather than hidden in a single number.
Request a consultation on Lost Profits or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.