KW Economics prepares wrongful death analysis for product liability cases venued in Massachusetts: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to Massachusetts damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
When a product causes a death, the economic claim follows the wrongful death structure with the personal consumption deduction as the key assumption. Because product cases often involve children, homemakers, and retirees, the household services and support components frequently carry more of the loss than the earnings component, and the economist builds the analysis from the household's account and time-use data where wage records do not exist. Earnings for a child or student are projected from the educational path and occupational data, personal consumption from household expenditure data adjusted to the household, and each survivor's loss is discounted to present value.
The economic loss to survivors when a wage earner or homemaker dies: the decedent's lost earnings and fringe benefits net of personal consumption, the household services the decedent would have provided, and the financial support that would have flowed to dependents. Which elements are recoverable, and whether the loss is measured to the estate or to the survivors, vary by state, so the analysis is structured to the framework counsel identifies and every assumption is stated so it can be examined.
The exposure tracks the injury: burns, amputations, and neurological injuries produce large future earnings and care losses; less severe injuries produce a bounded past loss and limited future treatment. Because product cases often involve children, homemakers, and retirees, the household services and care components frequently outweigh the earnings loss, and the analysis must be built from those components rather than from wage records that do not exist. For fatal injuries the exposure follows the wrongful death structure with the personal consumption deduction as the key assumption.
Massachusetts courts ask whether the reasoning and methodology behind an expert opinion are reliable, which can be shown either by general acceptance in the profession or by the reliability factors the federal courts use, and whether the witness is qualified by training and experience. Forensic economic methods satisfy that inquiry through their published literature, so the examination usually turns on the inputs and their support in the record.
Highest court: Supreme Judicial Court. Court system: mass.gov.
Federal venues: District of Massachusetts.
Outside the civil courts, wage-loss disputes in workers' compensation matters proceed before the Massachusetts Department of Industrial Accidents.
Massachusetts measures wrongful death by the fair monetary value of the decedent to the beneficiaries, including lost income, services, protection, care, assistance, society, and companionship, and permits punitive damages for gross negligence, with the decedent's own conscious suffering recovered by the estate. Recovery is barred once the plaintiff's fault exceeds the combined fault of the defendants, the common-law collateral source rule applies outside medical malpractice, and prejudgment interest on tort awards runs from the commencement of the action.
We issue the final report and provide deposition and trial testimony, rebuttal of opposing opinions, and supplemental calculations if the framework or the record changes.
When a product causes a death, the economic claim follows the wrongful death structure with the personal consumption deduction as the key assumption. Because product cases often involve children, homemakers, and retirees, the household services and support components frequently carry more of the loss than the earnings component, and the economist builds the analysis from the household's account and time-use data where wage records do not exist. Earnings for a child or student are projected from the educational path and occupational data, personal consumption from household expenditure data adjusted to the household, and each survivor's loss is discounted to present value.
Massachusetts courts ask whether the reasoning and methodology behind an expert opinion are reliable, which can be shown either by general acceptance in the profession or by the reliability factors the federal courts use, and whether the witness is qualified by training and experience. Forensic economic methods satisfy that inquiry through their published literature, so the examination usually turns on the inputs and their support in the record. Product Liability cases venued in Massachusetts are heard in the Superior Court (General jurisdiction; larger civil cases, major criminal cases), with final appeals to the Supreme Judicial Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the District of Massachusetts.
Massachusetts measures wrongful death by the fair monetary value of the decedent to the beneficiaries, including lost income, services, protection, care, assistance, society, and companionship, and permits punitive damages for gross negligence, with the decedent's own conscious suffering recovered by the estate. Recovery is barred once the plaintiff's fault exceeds the combined fault of the defendants, the common-law collateral source rule applies outside medical malpractice, and prejudgment interest on tort awards runs from the commencement of the action. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the Massachusetts rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on Wrongful Death or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.