Employment Discrimination Economic Damages Expert in California

By Christopher Skerritt, M.Ed., MBA, Chief of Economic Services · Published · Reviewed

KW Economics prepares economic damages analyses for employment discrimination cases venued in California: the components the loss claim consists of, the records that drive them, and a present value built to California's damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.

An employment discrimination economic claim measures the gap between the compensation the employee would have received absent the adverse action and the compensation actually received, as back pay, front pay, and lost benefits net of mitigation. Read the full employment discrimination analysis guide.

California courts and expert standards

California courts ask whether the reasoning and data behind an expert opinion are sound and whether the opinion rests on matter of a type experts reasonably rely on, reserving a general-acceptance test for novel scientific techniques; the witness is qualified by training and experience. Economic damages testimony is therefore examined on its inputs and logic: whether the worklife, growth, and discount assumptions have a published basis and whether they fit the record.

Where these cases are heard

Highest court: Supreme Court of California. Federal venues: N.D. Cal., E.D. Cal., C.D. Cal., S.D. Cal. Court system: courts.ca.gov.

Damages framework

California applies pure comparative fault in a negligence-based claim, reducing the award in proportion to the plaintiff's share. Interest before judgment runs as of right on a sum that was certain or capable of being made certain by calculation, is discretionary on an unliquidated contract claim, and in injury cases turns on the statutory offer-to-compromise procedure. Economic damages are not subject to a general statutory limit outside specific statutory claims, so the report states each loss as of a fixed date and identifies the components that were certain when they accrued.

How the analysis is built

The same four steps apply to an employment discrimination case venued in California; the damages framework above decides which components enter the total.

  1. Reconstruct the but-for compensation path from the employee's history and the employer's pay practices, including raises, bonus patterns, and benefit accruals.
  2. Compare that path with actual post-action earnings year by year, crediting mitigation from the employee's records or from local wage and unemployment duration data.
  3. Project front pay over the period the record supports for reaching comparable employment, with the loss shown at alternative durations.
  4. Separate back pay, front pay, and benefits, discount the future amounts to present value, and supply the schedule counsel needs for prejudgment interest.

Attorney guides for employment discrimination cases

Other case types in California

Frequently asked: employment discrimination cases in California

Which California courts hear employment discrimination cases?

Employment Discrimination cases venued in California are heard in the Superior Court (Unified general jurisdiction trial court in each of 58 counties; handles all civil and criminal matters). Final appeals run to the Supreme Court of California. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the United States District Courts for the Northern District of California, Eastern District of California, Central District of California, and Southern District of California.

How does California's damages framework shape the economic analysis?

California applies pure comparative fault in a negligence-based claim, reducing the award in proportion to the plaintiff's share. Interest before judgment runs as of right on a sum that was certain or capable of being made certain by calculation, is discretionary on an unliquidated contract claim, and in injury cases turns on the statutory offer-to-compromise procedure. Economic damages are not subject to a general statutory limit outside specific statutory claims, so the report states each loss as of a fixed date and identifies the components that were certain when they accrued. California courts ask whether the reasoning and data behind an expert opinion are sound and whether the opinion rests on matter of a type experts reasonably rely on, reserving a general-acceptance test for novel scientific techniques; the witness is qualified by training and experience. Economic damages testimony is therefore examined on its inputs and logic: whether the worklife, growth, and discount assumptions have a published basis and whether they fit the record.

More questions about employment discrimination analysis

References

Request a consultation on employment discrimination cases in California or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.