Product Liability Economic Damages Expert in California

By Christopher Skerritt, M.Ed., MBA, Chief of Economic Services · Published · Reviewed

KW Economics prepares economic damages analyses for product liability cases venued in California: the components the loss claim consists of, the records that drive them, and a present value built to California's damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.

A product liability economic claim measures lost earnings and benefits, household services, and the present value of future care, or the survivors' loss when the injury was fatal, built from the injured person's own path rather than from an occupation the product happened to involve. Read the full product liability analysis guide.

California courts and expert standards

California courts ask whether the reasoning and data behind an expert opinion are sound and whether the opinion rests on matter of a type experts reasonably rely on, reserving a general-acceptance test for novel scientific techniques; the witness is qualified by training and experience. Economic damages testimony is therefore examined on its inputs and logic: whether the worklife, growth, and discount assumptions have a published basis and whether they fit the record.

Where these cases are heard

Highest court: Supreme Court of California. Federal venues: N.D. Cal., E.D. Cal., C.D. Cal., S.D. Cal. Court system: courts.ca.gov.

Outside the civil courts, wage-loss disputes in workers' compensation matters proceed before the California Division of Workers' Compensation.

Damages framework

California pairs a wrongful death action for the heirs' economic and companionship losses with a survival action for the estate's own claims, and past medical expenses are measured by the amounts actually paid or owed rather than by the amounts billed. Pure comparative fault reduces the award in proportion, the collateral source rule applies outside medical malpractice, and prejudgment interest in injury cases turns on the statutory offer-to-compromise procedure rather than accruing as of right.

How the analysis is built

The same four steps apply to a product liability case venued in California; the damages framework above decides which components enter the total.

  1. Establish the but-for path from the earnings history or, for a child, student, or homemaker, from the educational path, occupational data, or the household work performed.
  2. Draw the post-injury path from actual earnings and the work-capacity opinions, and project both paths over the applicable worklife or life expectancy with growth.
  3. Value household services from time-use data and local rates, and price future care from the life care plan with category-specific cost growth.
  4. Discount every stream to present value at a stated rate and, where there are multiple claimants, apply one documented methodology to each record.

Attorney guides for product liability cases

Other case types in California

Frequently asked: product liability cases in California

Which California courts hear product liability cases?

Product Liability cases venued in California are heard in the Superior Court (Unified general jurisdiction trial court in each of 58 counties; handles all civil and criminal matters). Final appeals run to the Supreme Court of California. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the United States District Courts for the Northern District of California, Eastern District of California, Central District of California, and Southern District of California.

How does California's damages framework shape the economic analysis?

California pairs a wrongful death action for the heirs' economic and companionship losses with a survival action for the estate's own claims, and past medical expenses are measured by the amounts actually paid or owed rather than by the amounts billed. Pure comparative fault reduces the award in proportion, the collateral source rule applies outside medical malpractice, and prejudgment interest in injury cases turns on the statutory offer-to-compromise procedure rather than accruing as of right. California courts ask whether the reasoning and data behind an expert opinion are sound and whether the opinion rests on matter of a type experts reasonably rely on, reserving a general-acceptance test for novel scientific techniques; the witness is qualified by training and experience. Economic damages testimony is therefore examined on its inputs and logic: whether the worklife, growth, and discount assumptions have a published basis and whether they fit the record.

More questions about product liability analysis

References

Request a consultation on product liability cases in California or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.