Workers' Compensation Economic Damages Expert in South Dakota

By Christopher Skerritt, M.Ed., MBA, Chief of Economic Services · Published · Reviewed

KW Economics prepares economic damages analyses for workers' compensation cases venued in South Dakota: the components the loss claim consists of, the records that drive them, and a present value built to South Dakota's damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.

A workers' compensation economic analysis values the future indemnity and medical benefits at issue in a settlement, measures the wage loss that determines a benefit, or quantifies the loss in a third-party action, each structured to the question the compensation system asks. Read the full workers' compensation analysis guide.

South Dakota courts and expert standards

South Dakota courts screen expert testimony for reliability: the trial judge asks whether the economist is qualified, whether the opinion rests on sufficient facts and reliable principles and methods, and whether those methods were reliably applied to the case. A damages report is written to that standard, with each data series named and each assumption tied to the record.

Where these cases are heard

Highest court: South Dakota Supreme Court. Federal venues: D.S.D. Court system: ujs.sd.gov.

Compensation forum: South Dakota Department of Labor and Regulation, Division of Labor and Management. Third-party actions arising from the same injury proceed in the civil courts listed above, and the report separates what the compensation system pays from what the civil claim adds.

Damages framework

South Dakota provides a wrongful death action for the pecuniary injury to the surviving spouse, children, or next of kin, which the courts read to include loss of companionship and society, alongside a survival action for the estate. The state's unusual comparative negligence rule allows recovery only when the plaintiff's negligence was slight in comparison with the defendant's, the common-law collateral source rule applies, and prejudgment interest is allowed on past damages but not on future damages, punitive damages, or intangible losses.

How the analysis is built

The same four steps apply to a workers' compensation case venued in South Dakota; the damages framework above decides which components enter the total.

  1. Assemble the pre-injury wage base from the employer's records and tax documents.
  2. Establish the post-injury earnings path from actual earnings or the work-capacity opinions, and measure the loss over the applicable worklife with wage growth.
  3. Value future indemnity streams with stated mortality and discount assumptions, and grow and discount future medical by category when a treatment projection exists.
  4. Separate the amounts the compensation system pays from the components a third-party claim adds, and reconcile the two so the same facts support both.

Attorney guides for workers' compensation cases

Other case types in South Dakota

Frequently asked: workers' compensation cases in South Dakota

Which South Dakota courts hear workers' compensation cases?

Workers' Compensation cases venued in South Dakota are heard in the Circuit Court (General jurisdiction; 7 circuits across 66 counties; all civil, criminal, and domestic matters). Final appeals run to the South Dakota Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota.

How does South Dakota's damages framework shape the economic analysis?

South Dakota provides a wrongful death action for the pecuniary injury to the surviving spouse, children, or next of kin, which the courts read to include loss of companionship and society, alongside a survival action for the estate. The state's unusual comparative negligence rule allows recovery only when the plaintiff's negligence was slight in comparison with the defendant's, the common-law collateral source rule applies, and prejudgment interest is allowed on past damages but not on future damages, punitive damages, or intangible losses. South Dakota courts screen expert testimony for reliability: the trial judge asks whether the economist is qualified, whether the opinion rests on sufficient facts and reliable principles and methods, and whether those methods were reliably applied to the case. A damages report is written to that standard, with each data series named and each assumption tied to the record.

More questions about workers' compensation analysis

References

Request a consultation on workers' compensation cases in South Dakota or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.