Wrongful Termination Economic Damages Expert in South Dakota

By Christopher Skerritt, M.Ed., MBA, Chief of Economic Services · Published · Reviewed

KW Economics prepares economic damages analyses for wrongful termination cases venued in South Dakota: the components the loss claim consists of, the records that drive them, and a present value built to South Dakota's damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.

A wrongful termination economic claim measures what the employee lost when the employment ended, as back pay, front pay, and lost benefits, and how much of that loss has been or should be replaced by other work. Read the full wrongful termination analysis guide.

South Dakota courts and expert standards

South Dakota courts screen expert testimony for reliability: the trial judge asks whether the economist is qualified, whether the opinion rests on sufficient facts and reliable principles and methods, and whether those methods were reliably applied to the case. A damages report is written to that standard, with each data series named and each assumption tied to the record.

Where these cases are heard

Highest court: South Dakota Supreme Court. Federal venues: D.S.D. Court system: ujs.sd.gov.

Damages framework

South Dakota's unusual comparative negligence rule allows recovery in a negligence-based claim only when the plaintiff's negligence was slight in comparison with the defendant's. Prejudgment interest is allowed on past damages but not on future damages, punitive damages, or intangible losses, so the report separates past from future amounts as of a fixed date. Economic damages are not subject to a general statutory limit outside specific statutory claims.

How the analysis is built

The same four steps apply to a wrongful termination case venued in South Dakota; the damages framework above decides which components enter the total.

  1. Build the but-for compensation path from the pay history and the employer's pay and promotion practices, including the benefit accruals that would have continued.
  2. Compare it with the replacement earnings actually received, or with a reasonable job-search duration and replacement wage level drawn from local occupational data.
  3. Calculate pension and deferred compensation losses from the plan terms and equity losses from the award schedule.
  4. Discount the future components to present value at a stated rate and present back pay, front pay, and benefits separately.

Attorney guides for wrongful termination cases

Other case types in South Dakota

Frequently asked: wrongful termination cases in South Dakota

Which South Dakota courts hear wrongful termination cases?

Wrongful Termination cases venued in South Dakota are heard in the Circuit Court (General jurisdiction; 7 circuits across 66 counties; all civil, criminal, and domestic matters). Final appeals run to the South Dakota Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota.

How does South Dakota's damages framework shape the economic analysis?

South Dakota's unusual comparative negligence rule allows recovery in a negligence-based claim only when the plaintiff's negligence was slight in comparison with the defendant's. Prejudgment interest is allowed on past damages but not on future damages, punitive damages, or intangible losses, so the report separates past from future amounts as of a fixed date. Economic damages are not subject to a general statutory limit outside specific statutory claims. South Dakota courts screen expert testimony for reliability: the trial judge asks whether the economist is qualified, whether the opinion rests on sufficient facts and reliable principles and methods, and whether those methods were reliably applied to the case. A damages report is written to that standard, with each data series named and each assumption tied to the record.

More questions about wrongful termination analysis

References

Request a consultation on wrongful termination cases in South Dakota or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.