KW Economics prepares rebuttal analysis for fraud and embezzlement cases venued in New Mexico: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to New Mexico damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
An opposing loss quantification in a fraud matter is tested on whether each amount was confirmed against bank statements and third-party documents or taken from the internal books, whether estimated periods are separated from documented ones, whether the tracing follows the funds step by step or assumes a destination, and whether consequential losses are linked to the diversion or include losses that other causes produced. The economist checks the transaction schedules against the records, recalculates the loss by scheme and period under corrected inputs, and states what the records support and what they do not.
Critique of an opposing economic damages, valuation, or forensic accounting report for plaintiff or defense counsel. The review tests the assumptions, data sources, discount rates, worklife and life expectancy inputs, growth rates, mitigation treatment, and arithmetic behind the opposing number, identifies the errors that matter, and quantifies how the conclusion changes when they are corrected. The result supports cross-examination, a rebuttal report, or a motion directed at the reliability of the opinion.
The direct loss is usually the amount traced through the records, and its size depends on how long the scheme ran and how far back the records permit reconstruction. Consequential losses can exceed the direct loss when the diversion starved a business of working capital or caused a default. Where the funds were used to acquire assets, tracing to those assets can support recovery from the assets themselves, which changes the practical exposure. The analysis states the amounts by year and by method so that partial findings and limitations are visible.
New Mexico courts ask the trial judge to act as gatekeeper for expert testimony, examining whether the economist is qualified, whether the method is reliable and accepted in the profession, and whether it was applied reliably to the facts of the case. A damages report answers those questions by stating its assumptions and citing its sources.
Highest court: New Mexico Supreme Court. Court system: nmcourts.gov.
Federal venues: District of New Mexico.
New Mexico applies pure comparative fault in a negligence-based claim, reducing the award in proportion to the plaintiff's share. Prejudgment interest is discretionary and weighs each party's settlement conduct, so the report separates past from future amounts and supplies the schedule the court would need to award it. Economic damages are not subject to a general statutory limit outside specific statutory claims.
We issue a rebuttal report where one is disclosed and provide deposition and trial testimony, cross-examination outlines, and support for motions directed at the opinion.
An opposing loss quantification in a fraud matter is tested on whether each amount was confirmed against bank statements and third-party documents or taken from the internal books, whether estimated periods are separated from documented ones, whether the tracing follows the funds step by step or assumes a destination, and whether consequential losses are linked to the diversion or include losses that other causes produced. The economist checks the transaction schedules against the records, recalculates the loss by scheme and period under corrected inputs, and states what the records support and what they do not.
New Mexico courts ask the trial judge to act as gatekeeper for expert testimony, examining whether the economist is qualified, whether the method is reliable and accepted in the profession, and whether it was applied reliably to the facts of the case. A damages report answers those questions by stating its assumptions and citing its sources. Fraud and Embezzlement cases venued in New Mexico are heard in the District Court (General jurisdiction; 13 judicial districts; all civil, criminal, and domestic matters) and the Bernalillo County Metropolitan Court (Largest limited jurisdiction court; covers Albuquerque), with final appeals to the New Mexico Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the District of New Mexico.
New Mexico applies pure comparative fault in a negligence-based claim, reducing the award in proportion to the plaintiff's share. Prejudgment interest is discretionary and weighs each party's settlement conduct, so the report separates past from future amounts and supplies the schedule the court would need to award it. Economic damages are not subject to a general statutory limit outside specific statutory claims. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the New Mexico rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on Rebuttal or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.