KW Economics prepares rebuttal analysis for fraud and embezzlement cases venued in Maryland: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to Maryland damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
An opposing loss quantification in a fraud matter is tested on whether each amount was confirmed against bank statements and third-party documents or taken from the internal books, whether estimated periods are separated from documented ones, whether the tracing follows the funds step by step or assumes a destination, and whether consequential losses are linked to the diversion or include losses that other causes produced. The economist checks the transaction schedules against the records, recalculates the loss by scheme and period under corrected inputs, and states what the records support and what they do not.
Critique of an opposing economic damages, valuation, or forensic accounting report for plaintiff or defense counsel. The review tests the assumptions, data sources, discount rates, worklife and life expectancy inputs, growth rates, mitigation treatment, and arithmetic behind the opposing number, identifies the errors that matter, and quantifies how the conclusion changes when they are corrected. The result supports cross-examination, a rebuttal report, or a motion directed at the reliability of the opinion.
The direct loss is usually the amount traced through the records, and its size depends on how long the scheme ran and how far back the records permit reconstruction. Consequential losses can exceed the direct loss when the diversion starved a business of working capital or caused a default. Where the funds were used to acquire assets, tracing to those assets can support recovery from the assets themselves, which changes the practical exposure. The analysis states the amounts by year and by method so that partial findings and limitations are visible.
Maryland courts now apply a reliability inquiry to all expert testimony: the trial judge asks whether the economist is qualified, whether the method is one the profession has tested and accepted, and whether it was reliably applied to the facts of the case. An economic damages report is written to that standard, with each rate and table traced to its source.
Highest court: Supreme Court of Maryland. Court system: courts.state.md.us.
Federal venues: District of Maryland.
Maryland retains contributory negligence, so in a negligence-based claim any fault on the plaintiff's part is a complete bar rather than a percentage reduction. Prejudgment interest is available as of right on a liquidated contract sum from the date it was due and generally not on unliquidated tort damages. A statutory limit applies to the noneconomic portion of most awards while economic damages are unlimited, so the economist's figure enters the case at its full present value, stated as of a fixed date.
We issue a rebuttal report where one is disclosed and provide deposition and trial testimony, cross-examination outlines, and support for motions directed at the opinion.
An opposing loss quantification in a fraud matter is tested on whether each amount was confirmed against bank statements and third-party documents or taken from the internal books, whether estimated periods are separated from documented ones, whether the tracing follows the funds step by step or assumes a destination, and whether consequential losses are linked to the diversion or include losses that other causes produced. The economist checks the transaction schedules against the records, recalculates the loss by scheme and period under corrected inputs, and states what the records support and what they do not.
Maryland courts now apply a reliability inquiry to all expert testimony: the trial judge asks whether the economist is qualified, whether the method is one the profession has tested and accepted, and whether it was reliably applied to the facts of the case. An economic damages report is written to that standard, with each rate and table traced to its source. Fraud and Embezzlement cases venued in Maryland are heard in the Circuit Court (General jurisdiction; larger civil cases, felonies, equity, domestic relations), with final appeals to the Supreme Court of Maryland. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the District of Maryland.
Maryland retains contributory negligence, so in a negligence-based claim any fault on the plaintiff's part is a complete bar rather than a percentage reduction. Prejudgment interest is available as of right on a liquidated contract sum from the date it was due and generally not on unliquidated tort damages. A statutory limit applies to the noneconomic portion of most awards while economic damages are unlimited, so the economist's figure enters the case at its full present value, stated as of a fixed date. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the Maryland rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on Rebuttal or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.