KW Economics provides rebuttal analysis for matters venued in Minnesota. The review tests the opposing report's assumptions, data sources, discount rate, worklife and life expectancy inputs, growth rates, mitigation treatment, and arithmetic against the record and the published data, identifies the errors that matter, and quantifies how the conclusion changes when they are corrected. The critique is written to the reliability standard the Minnesota forum applies to expert opinion and to its disclosure practice. Plaintiff and defense.
Minnesota's District Court is the primary trial-level forum for the personal injury, wrongful death, employment, and commercial damages claims these analyses support. Workers' compensation claims, where the dispute is over wage-loss benefits rather than tort damages, are administered by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, Workers' Compensation Division. Final appeals in the Minnesota court system run to the Minnesota Supreme Court. Minnesota is served by 1 federal district court, where the same analyses are offered under the federal expert-disclosure framework.
Critique of an opposing economic damages, valuation, or forensic accounting report for plaintiff or defense counsel. The review tests the assumptions, data sources, discount rates, worklife and life expectancy inputs, growth rates, mitigation treatment, and arithmetic behind the opposing number, identifies the errors that matter, and quantifies how the conclusion changes when they are corrected. The result supports cross-examination, a rebuttal report, or a motion directed at the reliability of the opinion.
A rebuttal engagement in Minnesota reaches the same forum as the report it reviews: the District Court for personal injury, wrongful death, employment, and commercial claims, the federal district courts serving Minnesota where jurisdiction allows, and the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, Workers' Compensation Division where the dispute is over wage-loss benefits. The critique is written to the reliability standard that forum applies to expert opinion and to its disclosure practice, so it can be served as a rebuttal report or used to prepare cross-examination.
Rebuttal analysis for Minnesota matters is directed by Christopher Skerritt, M.Ed., MBA, Chief of Economic Services, who is available to testify to it.
Our experts serve clients throughout Minnesota, including the following communities.
KW Economics offers complementary services to support your Minnesota cases.
Yes. KW Economics provides rebuttal analysis for attorneys handling matters venued in Minnesota, for plaintiff and defense counsel, with the analysis sized to the engagement scope and built from the records that drive the claim and from data for the Minnesota market rather than from national averages.
A rebuttal engagement typically includes a records request for the opposing report, its workpapers, and the data it relied on, a line-by-line review of the assumptions, inputs, and arithmetic, a written critique that quantifies how the conclusion changes when each error is corrected, an affirmative alternative calculation where counsel wants one, and deposition and trial testimony when required. Scope and turnaround are calibrated to the case posture and the governing disclosure framework.
Expert disclosure in Minnesota is scheduled case by case: in the Minnesota trial courts by the case management or scheduling order, and in the federal district courts serving Minnesota by the federal expert-disclosure framework, under which the written report, the materials considered, and the testimony history are served together. KW Economics confirms the disclosure date at retention and sizes the records request and turnaround to it; counsel confirms the governing deadline for the case.
Request a consultation on Rebuttal in Minnesota or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.