KW Economics prepares intellectual property damages analysis for partnership and shareholder dispute cases venued in Oklahoma: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to Oklahoma damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
In an owner dispute the intellectual property question is usually who took what: a departing partner, member, or shareholder who used the company's trade secrets, customer information, or technology in a competing venture, or a controlling owner who moved the company's patents, marks, or software into an entity the owner holds separately. The economist measures the company's actual loss from the diverted sales and customers, the competing venture's profits attributable to the information, and, where those are hard to isolate, a reasonable royalty for the use, net of any overlap, and coordinates the measure with any valuation of an owner's interest, so the same lost earnings are not counted both as damages and as a reduction in the value of the interest.
Economic analysis and expert testimony on damages in patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret cases and in license and royalty disputes, for the patentee or the accused infringer and for either side of every other claim. The work measures each remedy the governing statute allows: a reasonable royalty and the patentee's lost profits, including price erosion, apportioned to the patented feature; the defendant's profits, the owner's actual damages, and corrective advertising in a trademark case; actual damages and the infringer's profits in a copyright case, where the infringer carries the burden of its deductible expenses and of the profit owed to other factors; and actual loss, unjust enrichment, or a reasonable royalty for a misappropriated trade secret.
The valuation date and the standard of value control the result: a fair value standard may exclude the minority and marketability discounts that a fair market value standard applies, and the gap between the two can be substantial for a minority interest in a closely held company. Normalizing adjustments to owner compensation and related-party dealings often decide whether the business shows earnings to value at all. Where the claim includes diverted profits, the amount depends on how far back the records permit reconstruction and on whether the business's actual results can be separated from market conditions.
Oklahoma trial judges act as gatekeepers for expert testimony and ask whether the economist is qualified, whether the method is reliable and accepted in the profession, and whether it was applied reliably to the facts of the case. An economic damages report answers that inquiry by stating its assumptions and citing the data behind each one.
Highest court: Oklahoma Supreme Court. Court system: oscn.net.
Federal venues: Northern District of Oklahoma, Eastern District of Oklahoma, Western District of Oklahoma.
Oklahoma reduces a negligence-based award by the plaintiff's share of fault and bars recovery once that share exceeds the combined fault of the defendants. Interest on a liquidated contract sum runs from the date it became due, and prejudgment interest on a personal injury award begins only after a defined period following the filing of the suit. The courts have struck down a general legislative limit on noneconomic damages, and economic damages are not subject to a general statutory limit, so the economist's figure enters the case at its full present value.
We issue the final report on the disclosure schedule and provide deposition and trial testimony, critique of the opposing damages analysis, and updated calculations as the court construes any patent claims and the record develops.
In an owner dispute the intellectual property question is usually who took what: a departing partner, member, or shareholder who used the company's trade secrets, customer information, or technology in a competing venture, or a controlling owner who moved the company's patents, marks, or software into an entity the owner holds separately. The economist measures the company's actual loss from the diverted sales and customers, the competing venture's profits attributable to the information, and, where those are hard to isolate, a reasonable royalty for the use, net of any overlap, and coordinates the measure with any valuation of an owner's interest, so the same lost earnings are not counted both as damages and as a reduction in the value of the interest.
Oklahoma trial judges act as gatekeepers for expert testimony and ask whether the economist is qualified, whether the method is reliable and accepted in the profession, and whether it was applied reliably to the facts of the case. An economic damages report answers that inquiry by stating its assumptions and citing the data behind each one. Partnership and Shareholder Dispute cases venued in Oklahoma are heard in the District Court (General jurisdiction; 26 judicial districts; all civil and criminal matters), with final appeals to the Oklahoma Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the Northern District of Oklahoma, Eastern District of Oklahoma, and Western District of Oklahoma.
Oklahoma reduces a negligence-based award by the plaintiff's share of fault and bars recovery once that share exceeds the combined fault of the defendants. Interest on a liquidated contract sum runs from the date it became due, and prejudgment interest on a personal injury award begins only after a defined period following the filing of the suit. The courts have struck down a general legislative limit on noneconomic damages, and economic damages are not subject to a general statutory limit, so the economist's figure enters the case at its full present value. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the Oklahoma rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on IP Damages or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.