KW Economics prepares intellectual property damages analysis for partnership and shareholder dispute cases venued in Utah: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to Utah damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
In an owner dispute the intellectual property question is usually who took what: a departing partner, member, or shareholder who used the company's trade secrets, customer information, or technology in a competing venture, or a controlling owner who moved the company's patents, marks, or software into an entity the owner holds separately. The economist measures the company's actual loss from the diverted sales and customers, the competing venture's profits attributable to the information, and, where those are hard to isolate, a reasonable royalty for the use, net of any overlap, and coordinates the measure with any valuation of an owner's interest, so the same lost earnings are not counted both as damages and as a reduction in the value of the interest.
Economic analysis and expert testimony on damages in patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret cases and in license and royalty disputes, for the patentee or the accused infringer and for either side of every other claim. The work measures each remedy the governing statute allows: a reasonable royalty and the patentee's lost profits, including price erosion, apportioned to the patented feature; the defendant's profits, the owner's actual damages, and corrective advertising in a trademark case; actual damages and the infringer's profits in a copyright case, where the infringer carries the burden of its deductible expenses and of the profit owed to other factors; and actual loss, unjust enrichment, or a reasonable royalty for a misappropriated trade secret.
The valuation date and the standard of value control the result: a fair value standard may exclude the minority and marketability discounts that a fair market value standard applies, and the gap between the two can be substantial for a minority interest in a closely held company. Normalizing adjustments to owner compensation and related-party dealings often decide whether the business shows earnings to value at all. Where the claim includes diverted profits, the amount depends on how far back the records permit reconstruction and on whether the business's actual results can be separated from market conditions.
Utah courts require a threshold showing that an expert's principles and methods are reliable, rest on sufficient facts, and were reliably applied to the case, with the witness qualified by training and experience, and leave the remaining questions of weight to the jury. An economic damages report meets that threshold by showing the published basis for each assumption and its fit with the record.
Highest court: Utah Supreme Court. Court system: utcourts.gov.
Federal venues: District of Utah.
Utah reduces a negligence-based award by the plaintiff's share of fault and bars recovery once that share reaches half, and the state constitution bars any statutory limit on the amount recoverable for wrongful death. Prejudgment interest is available on a liquidated sum and on the special damages actually incurred before judgment in a personal injury case, but not on projected future loss. Economic damages are not subject to a general statutory limit outside specific statutory claims, and the report identifies the liquidated and incurred components separately from the projected ones.
We issue the final report on the disclosure schedule and provide deposition and trial testimony, critique of the opposing damages analysis, and updated calculations as the court construes any patent claims and the record develops.
In an owner dispute the intellectual property question is usually who took what: a departing partner, member, or shareholder who used the company's trade secrets, customer information, or technology in a competing venture, or a controlling owner who moved the company's patents, marks, or software into an entity the owner holds separately. The economist measures the company's actual loss from the diverted sales and customers, the competing venture's profits attributable to the information, and, where those are hard to isolate, a reasonable royalty for the use, net of any overlap, and coordinates the measure with any valuation of an owner's interest, so the same lost earnings are not counted both as damages and as a reduction in the value of the interest.
Utah courts require a threshold showing that an expert's principles and methods are reliable, rest on sufficient facts, and were reliably applied to the case, with the witness qualified by training and experience, and leave the remaining questions of weight to the jury. An economic damages report meets that threshold by showing the published basis for each assumption and its fit with the record. Partnership and Shareholder Dispute cases venued in Utah are heard in the District Court (General jurisdiction; 8 judicial districts; all civil, criminal, domestic, and juvenile matters), with final appeals to the Utah Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the District of Utah.
Utah reduces a negligence-based award by the plaintiff's share of fault and bars recovery once that share reaches half, and the state constitution bars any statutory limit on the amount recoverable for wrongful death. Prejudgment interest is available on a liquidated sum and on the special damages actually incurred before judgment in a personal injury case, but not on projected future loss. Economic damages are not subject to a general statutory limit outside specific statutory claims, and the report identifies the liquidated and incurred components separately from the projected ones. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the Utah rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on IP Damages or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.