KW Economics prepares lost earnings analysis for medical malpractice cases venued in Georgia: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to Georgia damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
In a medical malpractice matter the lost earnings claim is measured against the outcome the patient would have had with proper care, not against perfect health. The economist takes the causation and prognosis opinions in the record as the baseline, states the but-for earnings path they support, and builds the injured path from actual post-injury earnings and the work-capacity opinions. The loss is the difference between the two paths, projected over the applicable worklife with growth and discounted to present value. Where the underlying condition would have limited work on its own, the apportionment between the injury and the condition is usually the assumption that most changes the total.
Past and future lost earnings and fringe benefits for a person whose injury has removed them from work or reduced what they can earn. The analysis builds from the earnings history, projects the but-for path over the person's expected worklife with wage growth, and discounts the future stream to present value. When the person can still work in a reduced capacity, the loss is framed as diminished earning capacity, with the post-injury path drawn from a vocational opinion or the treating record and offset against the but-for projection.
Because the underlying condition often affected work capacity or life expectancy on its own, the apportionment between the injury and the pre-existing condition is usually the most contested assumption and the one that most changes the total. In cases of permanent disability the incremental care costs and the earnings loss are both large and run across a long horizon, and the life expectancy used for each stream is a second point of contention. In delayed-diagnosis cases the loss may be measured as the difference between two outcome paths, each with its own earnings and care profile.
Georgia trial courts act as gatekeepers in civil cases and ask whether the economist is qualified by training and experience, whether the method has been tested and accepted in the profession, and whether it was applied reliably to the facts. An economic damages report meets that inquiry by stating its assumptions and naming the data series behind each one.
Highest court: Supreme Court of Georgia. Court system: gasupreme.us.
Federal venues: Northern District of Georgia, Middle District of Georgia, Southern District of Georgia.
Outside the civil courts, wage-loss disputes in workers' compensation matters proceed before the Georgia State Board of Workers' Compensation.
Georgia measures wrongful death by the full value of the life of the decedent from the decedent's own standpoint, an economic component built on lost earnings and services without deduction for the decedent's personal expenses plus an intangible component, while the estate separately recovers pre-death medical expenses, pain and suffering, and funeral costs. Recovery is barred once the plaintiff's fault reaches half, the common-law collateral source rule applies, and prejudgment interest on unliquidated tort damages is tied to a written demand procedure.
We issue the final report in disclosure-ready form and provide deposition and trial testimony, rebuttal of opposing economic opinions, and updated calculations as new records arrive.
The same four steps apply to a medical malpractice case venued in Georgia; the damages framework above decides which components enter the total. State the but-for path the causation opinions support: what the patient would have earned, for how long, and what care the underlying condition would have required regardless. Build the injured path from actual post-injury earnings, the work-capacity opinions, and the incremental care plan. Measure each component as the difference between the two paths, projected over the applicable life or worklife expectancy with stated growth. Discount the streams to present value and present the loss under each apportionment or life expectancy scenario the physicians offer.
Georgia trial courts act as gatekeepers in civil cases and ask whether the economist is qualified by training and experience, whether the method has been tested and accepted in the profession, and whether it was applied reliably to the facts. An economic damages report meets that inquiry by stating its assumptions and naming the data series behind each one. Medical Malpractice cases venued in Georgia are heard in the Superior Court (General jurisdiction; civil cases, felonies, domestic relations, equity) and the State Court (Civil actions regardless of amount except those reserved to the superior court, misdemeanors), with final appeals to the Supreme Court of Georgia. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the Northern District of Georgia, Middle District of Georgia, and Southern District of Georgia.
Georgia measures wrongful death by the full value of the life of the decedent from the decedent's own standpoint, an economic component built on lost earnings and services without deduction for the decedent's personal expenses plus an intangible component, while the estate separately recovers pre-death medical expenses, pain and suffering, and funeral costs. Recovery is barred once the plaintiff's fault reaches half, the common-law collateral source rule applies, and prejudgment interest on unliquidated tort damages is tied to a written demand procedure. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the Georgia rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on Lost Earnings or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.