KW Economics prepares lost earnings analysis for workers' compensation cases venued in Hawaii: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to Hawaii damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
Workers' compensation matters ask the lost earnings question in more than one setting: the wage loss or reduced earning capacity that the benefit is meant to replace, the present value of future indemnity payments at issue in a settlement, and the full earnings loss in a third-party action arising from the same injury. The economist assembles the pre-injury wage base from the employer's records and tax documents, establishes the post-injury earnings path from actual earnings or the work-capacity opinions, and measures the loss over the applicable worklife with wage growth. The report separates what the compensation system pays from what a civil claim adds so the same facts support both.
Past and future lost earnings and fringe benefits for a person whose injury has removed them from work or reduced what they can earn. The analysis builds from the earnings history, projects the but-for path over the person's expected worklife with wage growth, and discounts the future stream to present value. When the person can still work in a reduced capacity, the loss is framed as diminished earning capacity, with the post-injury path drawn from a vocational opinion or the treating record and offset against the but-for projection.
In a settlement, the present value of a long stream of indemnity payments is the central figure, and the discount rate and the claimant's life or worklife expectancy control it. In a third-party action the exposure resembles any personal injury claim, with the added task of identifying the benefits already paid so the lien and offset questions counsel raises can be answered from the same numbers. Where the benefit turns on earning capacity, the gap between pre-injury wages and what the person can now earn is the contested figure, and the post-injury wage level is the assumption that moves it.
Hawaii courts ask whether an expert opinion is relevant and reliable and whether it will help the jury, treating the reliability factors the federal courts use as helpful rather than required and not insisting on general acceptance; the witness is qualified by training and experience. An economic damages report is examined on whether its assumptions have a published basis and fit the record.
Highest court: Hawaii Supreme Court. Court system: courts.state.hi.us.
Federal venues: District of Hawaii.
Compensation forum: Hawaii Disability Compensation Division. Third-party actions arising from the same injury proceed in the civil courts listed above, and the report separates what the compensation system pays from what the civil claim adds.
Hawaii's wrongful death statute lets the surviving spouse, children, parents, and dependents recover their own losses of support, services, and companionship and lets the estate recover the decedent's lost future earnings net of personal consumption, so the economist prepares both a survivor-support projection and a net-earnings projection. Recovery is barred once the plaintiff's fault exceeds the combined fault of the defendants, the courts apply the collateral source rule with limited statutory exceptions, and prejudgment interest is discretionary.
We issue the final report in disclosure-ready form and provide deposition and trial testimony, rebuttal of opposing economic opinions, and updated calculations as new records arrive.
Workers' compensation matters ask the lost earnings question in more than one setting: the wage loss or reduced earning capacity that the benefit is meant to replace, the present value of future indemnity payments at issue in a settlement, and the full earnings loss in a third-party action arising from the same injury. The economist assembles the pre-injury wage base from the employer's records and tax documents, establishes the post-injury earnings path from actual earnings or the work-capacity opinions, and measures the loss over the applicable worklife with wage growth. The report separates what the compensation system pays from what a civil claim adds so the same facts support both.
Hawaii courts ask whether an expert opinion is relevant and reliable and whether it will help the jury, treating the reliability factors the federal courts use as helpful rather than required and not insisting on general acceptance; the witness is qualified by training and experience. An economic damages report is examined on whether its assumptions have a published basis and fit the record. Workers' Compensation claims in Hawaii proceed before the Hawaii Disability Compensation Division, and third-party actions arising from the same injury are heard in the Circuit Court (General jurisdiction; larger civil cases, felonies, family court division), with final appeals to the Hawaii Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the District of Hawaii.
Hawaii's wrongful death statute lets the surviving spouse, children, parents, and dependents recover their own losses of support, services, and companionship and lets the estate recover the decedent's lost future earnings net of personal consumption, so the economist prepares both a survivor-support projection and a net-earnings projection. Recovery is barred once the plaintiff's fault exceeds the combined fault of the defendants, the courts apply the collateral source rule with limited statutory exceptions, and prejudgment interest is discretionary. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the Hawaii rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on Lost Earnings or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.