KW Economics prepares lost earnings analysis for workers' compensation cases venued in New Mexico: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to New Mexico damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
Workers' compensation matters ask the lost earnings question in more than one setting: the wage loss or reduced earning capacity that the benefit is meant to replace, the present value of future indemnity payments at issue in a settlement, and the full earnings loss in a third-party action arising from the same injury. The economist assembles the pre-injury wage base from the employer's records and tax documents, establishes the post-injury earnings path from actual earnings or the work-capacity opinions, and measures the loss over the applicable worklife with wage growth. The report separates what the compensation system pays from what a civil claim adds so the same facts support both.
Past and future lost earnings and fringe benefits for a person whose injury has removed them from work or reduced what they can earn. The analysis builds from the earnings history, projects the but-for path over the person's expected worklife with wage growth, and discounts the future stream to present value. When the person can still work in a reduced capacity, the loss is framed as diminished earning capacity, with the post-injury path drawn from a vocational opinion or the treating record and offset against the but-for projection.
In a settlement, the present value of a long stream of indemnity payments is the central figure, and the discount rate and the claimant's life or worklife expectancy control it. In a third-party action the exposure resembles any personal injury claim, with the added task of identifying the benefits already paid so the lien and offset questions counsel raises can be answered from the same numbers. Where the benefit turns on earning capacity, the gap between pre-injury wages and what the person can now earn is the contested figure, and the post-injury wage level is the assumption that moves it.
New Mexico courts ask the trial judge to act as gatekeeper for expert testimony, examining whether the economist is qualified, whether the method is reliable and accepted in the profession, and whether it was applied reliably to the facts of the case. A damages report answers those questions by stating its assumptions and citing its sources.
Highest court: New Mexico Supreme Court. Court system: nmcourts.gov.
Federal venues: District of New Mexico.
Compensation forum: New Mexico Workers' Compensation Administration. Third-party actions arising from the same injury proceed in the civil courts listed above, and the report separates what the compensation system pays from what the civil claim adds.
New Mexico measures wrongful death by the worth of the decedent's life from the decedent's own standpoint, a recovery that belongs to the estate and includes lost earnings, the value of the decedent's life apart from earnings, and the decedent's own pre-death damages, with loss of consortium brought separately by close family. Pure comparative fault reduces the award in proportion, the common-law collateral source rule applies, and prejudgment interest is discretionary and weighs each party's settlement conduct.
We issue the final report in disclosure-ready form and provide deposition and trial testimony, rebuttal of opposing economic opinions, and updated calculations as new records arrive.
Workers' compensation matters ask the lost earnings question in more than one setting: the wage loss or reduced earning capacity that the benefit is meant to replace, the present value of future indemnity payments at issue in a settlement, and the full earnings loss in a third-party action arising from the same injury. The economist assembles the pre-injury wage base from the employer's records and tax documents, establishes the post-injury earnings path from actual earnings or the work-capacity opinions, and measures the loss over the applicable worklife with wage growth. The report separates what the compensation system pays from what a civil claim adds so the same facts support both.
New Mexico courts ask the trial judge to act as gatekeeper for expert testimony, examining whether the economist is qualified, whether the method is reliable and accepted in the profession, and whether it was applied reliably to the facts of the case. A damages report answers those questions by stating its assumptions and citing its sources. Workers' Compensation claims in New Mexico proceed before the New Mexico Workers' Compensation Administration, and third-party actions arising from the same injury are heard in the District Court (General jurisdiction; 13 judicial districts; all civil, criminal, and domestic matters) and the Bernalillo County Metropolitan Court (Largest limited jurisdiction court; covers Albuquerque), with final appeals to the New Mexico Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the District of New Mexico.
New Mexico measures wrongful death by the worth of the decedent's life from the decedent's own standpoint, a recovery that belongs to the estate and includes lost earnings, the value of the decedent's life apart from earnings, and the decedent's own pre-death damages, with loss of consortium brought separately by close family. Pure comparative fault reduces the award in proportion, the common-law collateral source rule applies, and prejudgment interest is discretionary and weighs each party's settlement conduct. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the New Mexico rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on Lost Earnings or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.