KW Economics prepares lost profits analysis for partnership and shareholder dispute cases venued in Alaska: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to Alaska damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
In a partnership or shareholder dispute a lost profits claim arises when one owner's conduct, such as diverting customers, competing with the business, or excluding a partner from its earnings, reduced the profits the business or the excluded owner would otherwise have received. The economist establishes the but-for profits from the company's history and market, links the shortfall to the conduct at issue, quantifies diverted revenue from the ledger and customer records, and presents the owner's share of the lost profits by year. The analysis is coordinated with any valuation of the interest so the same loss is not counted in both.
Lost profits and related commercial damages for contract, business-tort, and business-interruption matters. The analysis builds the but-for revenue and cost path from the company's own history, its market, and the terms of the disputed relationship, links each claimed loss to the conduct at issue, addresses mitigation, and reasons through the period of loss so the damages figure answers the causation question as well as the amount.
The valuation date and the standard of value control the result: a fair value standard may exclude the minority and marketability discounts that a fair market value standard applies, and the gap between the two can be substantial for a minority interest in a closely held company. Normalizing adjustments to owner compensation and related-party dealings often decide whether the business shows earnings to value at all. Where the claim includes diverted profits, the amount depends on how far back the records permit reconstruction and on whether the business's actual results can be separated from market conditions.
Alaska's trial judges act as gatekeepers for expert testimony and ask whether the economist is qualified by training and experience, whether the method is one the profession has tested and accepted, and whether it was applied reliably to the facts of the case. A damages report meets that inquiry by naming the published source behind every rate and table and tying each assumption to the record.
Highest court: Alaska Supreme Court. Court system: courts.alaska.gov.
Federal venues: District of Alaska.
Alaska allocates fault comparatively in a negligence-based claim, reducing the award in proportion to the plaintiff's share without a threshold bar. Prejudgment interest runs on damages from a defined accrual point, liquidated or not, so the interval between the loss and the judgment is part of every economic figure. Economic damages are not subject to a general statutory limit, and the report separates past from future amounts so the interest computation can follow.
We issue the final report and provide deposition and trial testimony and rebuttal of opposing damages models.
In a partnership or shareholder dispute a lost profits claim arises when one owner's conduct, such as diverting customers, competing with the business, or excluding a partner from its earnings, reduced the profits the business or the excluded owner would otherwise have received. The economist establishes the but-for profits from the company's history and market, links the shortfall to the conduct at issue, quantifies diverted revenue from the ledger and customer records, and presents the owner's share of the lost profits by year. The analysis is coordinated with any valuation of the interest so the same loss is not counted in both.
Alaska's trial judges act as gatekeepers for expert testimony and ask whether the economist is qualified by training and experience, whether the method is one the profession has tested and accepted, and whether it was applied reliably to the facts of the case. A damages report meets that inquiry by naming the published source behind every rate and table and tying each assumption to the record. Partnership and Shareholder Dispute cases venued in Alaska are heard in the Superior Court (General jurisdiction trial court; handles all civil and criminal matters), with final appeals to the Alaska Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the District of Alaska.
Alaska allocates fault comparatively in a negligence-based claim, reducing the award in proportion to the plaintiff's share without a threshold bar. Prejudgment interest runs on damages from a defined accrual point, liquidated or not, so the interval between the loss and the judgment is part of every economic figure. Economic damages are not subject to a general statutory limit, and the report separates past from future amounts so the interest computation can follow. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the Alaska rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on Lost Profits or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.