Fraud and Embezzlement Economic Damages Expert in Maryland

By Christopher Skerritt, M.Ed., MBA, Chief of Economic Services · Published · Reviewed

KW Economics prepares economic damages analyses for fraud and embezzlement cases venued in Maryland: the components the loss claim consists of, the records that drive them, and a present value built to Maryland's damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.

A fraud or embezzlement economic claim establishes how much was taken, over what period, by what mechanism, and where it went, and quantifies the loss in a form that supports a civil claim or a restitution figure. Read the full fraud and embezzlement analysis guide.

Maryland courts and expert standards

Maryland courts now apply a reliability inquiry to all expert testimony: the trial judge asks whether the economist is qualified, whether the method is one the profession has tested and accepted, and whether it was reliably applied to the facts of the case. An economic damages report is written to that standard, with each rate and table traced to its source.

Where these cases are heard

Highest court: Supreme Court of Maryland. Federal venues: D. Md. Court system: courts.state.md.us.

Damages framework

Maryland retains contributory negligence, so in a negligence-based claim any fault on the plaintiff's part is a complete bar rather than a percentage reduction. Prejudgment interest is available as of right on a liquidated contract sum from the date it was due and generally not on unliquidated tort damages. A statutory limit applies to the noneconomic portion of most awards while economic damages are unlimited, so the economist's figure enters the case at its full present value, stated as of a fixed date.

How the analysis is built

The same four steps apply to a fraud and embezzlement case venued in Maryland; the damages framework above decides which components enter the total.

  1. Map the scheme's mechanism from the records and identify each transaction that fits it.
  2. Confirm the amounts against bank statements, cancelled checks, and third-party documents rather than the internal books alone.
  3. Trace the diverted funds forward to the accounts and assets they reached, and quantify the consequential losses with the causal link explained.
  4. Separate the amounts established from records, the amounts estimated from patterns, and the amounts that could not be determined.

Attorney guides for fraud and embezzlement cases

Other case types in Maryland

Frequently asked: fraud and embezzlement cases in Maryland

Which Maryland courts hear fraud and embezzlement cases?

Fraud and Embezzlement cases venued in Maryland are heard in the Circuit Court (General jurisdiction; larger civil cases, felonies, equity, domestic relations). Final appeals run to the Supreme Court of Maryland. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland.

How does Maryland's damages framework shape the economic analysis?

Maryland retains contributory negligence, so in a negligence-based claim any fault on the plaintiff's part is a complete bar rather than a percentage reduction. Prejudgment interest is available as of right on a liquidated contract sum from the date it was due and generally not on unliquidated tort damages. A statutory limit applies to the noneconomic portion of most awards while economic damages are unlimited, so the economist's figure enters the case at its full present value, stated as of a fixed date. Maryland courts now apply a reliability inquiry to all expert testimony: the trial judge asks whether the economist is qualified, whether the method is one the profession has tested and accepted, and whether it was reliably applied to the facts of the case. An economic damages report is written to that standard, with each rate and table traced to its source.

More questions about fraud and embezzlement analysis

References

Request a consultation on fraud and embezzlement cases in Maryland or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.