Wrongful termination matters ask what the employee lost when the employment ended and how much of that loss has been or should be replaced by other work. The economist measures the gap between the compensation the employee would have received had the employment continued and the compensation actually earned since, projects that gap over a reasonable period, and reduces the future portion to present value.
In short
The claim consists of back pay from the termination date to the date of analysis, front pay for the period needed to reach comparable employment, lost fringe benefits including retirement contributions, health coverage, and equity or bonus plans, and in some matters the loss of pension or deferred compensation that vesting would have delivered. The mitigation side of the ledger consists of actual replacement earnings and, where the employee is not working, the earnings a reasonable search would have produced. The drivers are the employment agreement, payroll and personnel records, benefit plan documents, tax returns, and the record of the job search and any replacement work.
The most contested component is usually the front pay period, because the employee's age, occupation, and local market determine how quickly comparable work is reasonably available. For long-tenured employees, the loss of accrued pension benefits and retiree health coverage can rival the pay loss, and for employees with equity compensation the unvested awards forfeited at termination can be the largest single item. Where the employee found comparable work quickly, the claim may reduce to a documented back pay figure with small benefit differences.
The economist builds the but-for compensation path from the employee's pay history and the employer's pay and promotion practices, including the benefit accruals that would have continued, and compares it with the replacement earnings actually received. Where the employee has not found work, the report states a reasonable job-search duration and a replacement wage level drawn from local occupational data, and presents the loss under alternative durations. Pension and deferred compensation losses are calculated from the plan terms, equity losses from the award schedule, and the future components are discounted to present value with the rate stated. The report separates back pay, front pay, and benefits so each can be examined on its own record.
Stage-by-stage guidance on working with a forensic economist in wrongful termination litigation.
If the new job pays comparably with comparable benefits, the loss may be limited to the gap period and counsel can often present it from the records. If the new job pays less, offers fewer benefits, or lacks the advancement the prior job carried, an economist measures the ongoing difference over the period the record supports.
From the employee's own history and the employer's plan terms: the pattern of past awards, the plan's formula, and the performance of comparable employees where available. The economist states the basis for the projected amounts rather than assuming a maximum or minimum.
The economist applies the plan's benefit formula to the service and pay the employee would have accrued through the but-for retirement date and compares it with the benefit actually vested, then values the difference over the employee's expected retirement period. Plan documents and benefit statements are required.
The report can present either or both. The employer's contribution reflects what the compensation package was worth; the employee's cost to replace coverage reflects what the loss actually costs the household. The economist states which is used and why.
Request a consultation on wrongful termination cases or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.