KW Economics prepares rebuttal analysis for wrongful termination cases venued in Washington: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to Washington damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
A wrongful termination report is tested on the front pay period, the treatment of replacement earnings, and the valuation of benefits, pensions, and equity. The economist checks the but-for compensation path against the employment agreement and pay history, the replacement earnings against the employee's records and tax returns, the front pay duration against the employee's age, occupation, and local market, and the pension and equity losses against the plan terms and vesting schedules. Each finding is ranked by its effect on the total, and the loss is shown under the alternative durations the record supports.
Critique of an opposing economic damages, valuation, or forensic accounting report for plaintiff or defense counsel. The review tests the assumptions, data sources, discount rates, worklife and life expectancy inputs, growth rates, mitigation treatment, and arithmetic behind the opposing number, identifies the errors that matter, and quantifies how the conclusion changes when they are corrected. The result supports cross-examination, a rebuttal report, or a motion directed at the reliability of the opinion.
The most contested component is usually the front pay period, because the employee's age, occupation, and local market determine how quickly comparable work is reasonably available. For long-tenured employees, the loss of accrued pension benefits and retiree health coverage can rival the pay loss, and for employees with equity compensation the unvested awards forfeited at termination can be the largest single item. Where the employee found comparable work quickly, the claim may reduce to a documented back pay figure with small benefit differences.
Washington courts ask whether the methodology behind an expert opinion is generally accepted in the relevant professional community and whether the economist is qualified by training and experience to apply it, leaving disputes over the inputs to cross-examination. The methods of forensic economics are published and long used, so the examination of a damages report usually turns on its assumptions and their support in the record.
Highest court: Washington Supreme Court. Court system: courts.wa.gov.
Federal venues: Western District of Washington, Eastern District of Washington.
Washington applies pure comparative fault in a negligence-based claim, reducing the award in proportion to the plaintiff's share. Prejudgment interest is generally limited to liquidated sums, such as an unpaid contract balance, and not awarded on unliquidated damages. Statutory limits on noneconomic damages have been held unconstitutional and economic damages are not subject to a general statutory limit, so the economist's figure enters the case at its full present value, with the liquidated components identified separately.
We issue a rebuttal report where one is disclosed and provide deposition and trial testimony, cross-examination outlines, and support for motions directed at the opinion.
A wrongful termination report is tested on the front pay period, the treatment of replacement earnings, and the valuation of benefits, pensions, and equity. The economist checks the but-for compensation path against the employment agreement and pay history, the replacement earnings against the employee's records and tax returns, the front pay duration against the employee's age, occupation, and local market, and the pension and equity losses against the plan terms and vesting schedules. Each finding is ranked by its effect on the total, and the loss is shown under the alternative durations the record supports.
Washington courts ask whether the methodology behind an expert opinion is generally accepted in the relevant professional community and whether the economist is qualified by training and experience to apply it, leaving disputes over the inputs to cross-examination. The methods of forensic economics are published and long used, so the examination of a damages report usually turns on its assumptions and their support in the record. Wrongful Termination cases venued in Washington are heard in the Superior Court (General jurisdiction; one in each of 39 counties; all civil, criminal, and domestic matters), with final appeals to the Washington Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the Western District of Washington and Eastern District of Washington.
Washington applies pure comparative fault in a negligence-based claim, reducing the award in proportion to the plaintiff's share. Prejudgment interest is generally limited to liquidated sums, such as an unpaid contract balance, and not awarded on unliquidated damages. Statutory limits on noneconomic damages have been held unconstitutional and economic damages are not subject to a general statutory limit, so the economist's figure enters the case at its full present value, with the liquidated components identified separately. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the Washington rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on Rebuttal or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.