KW Economics prepares intellectual property damages analysis for commercial contract dispute cases venued in New York: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to New York damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
A commercial contract dispute becomes an intellectual property damages question when the contract is a license: a patent, trademark, software, or technology license whose royalties were underpaid, a licensee that kept selling after the license ended, or a dispute over the royalty base, the products covered, or the audit rights. The economist reads the license and its royalty provisions, rebuilds the royalty base from the licensee's sales records and any audit findings, and computes the shortfall by period under the contract's own terms. Where a licensee kept using the technology after termination, or an infringement claim is joined with the contract claim, the economist also measures the infringement damages, often a reasonable royalty informed by the license itself, and keeps the contract and infringement measures separate.
Economic analysis and expert testimony on damages in patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret cases and in license and royalty disputes, for the patentee or the accused infringer and for either side of every other claim. The work measures each remedy the governing statute allows: a reasonable royalty and the patentee's lost profits, including price erosion, apportioned to the patented feature; the defendant's profits, the owner's actual damages, and corrective advertising in a trademark case; actual damages and the infringer's profits in a copyright case, where the infringer carries the burden of its deductible expenses and of the profit owed to other factors; and actual loss, unjust enrichment, or a reasonable royalty for a misappropriated trade secret.
The size of the claim depends on the contract's remaining term, the profit margin the business would have realized, and how much of the lost volume was or could have been replaced. Incremental cost treatment is the usual battleground: whether a given cost would have been avoided when the revenue disappeared changes the margin and therefore the loss. For a new venture or a contract without a performance history, the reasonableness of the projected revenue is the central dispute, and the period over which lost profits are claimed is scrutinized against the contract's terms and the market.
New York courts ask whether the methodology behind an expert opinion is generally accepted in the relevant professional community and, separately, whether the economist applied it reliably to the facts of the case; qualification rests on training and experience. Forensic economic methods for lost earnings, household services, and present value are published and long used, so the examination of a damages report usually turns on its inputs and their support in the record.
Highest court: Court of Appeals. Court system: iapps.courts.state.ny.us.
Federal venues: Southern District of New York, Eastern District of New York, Northern District of New York, Western District of New York.
New York applies pure comparative fault in a negligence-based claim, reducing the award in proportion to the plaintiff's share. Interest before judgment runs as of right on a contract claim from the earliest date the damages were incurred and in a wrongful death action from the date of death, while a personal injury award carries interest only from the verdict. Economic damages are not subject to a general statutory limit, and larger future damage awards are converted to structured payments by the court, so the report presents the future stream year by year as well as in present value.
We issue the final report on the disclosure schedule and provide deposition and trial testimony, critique of the opposing damages analysis, and updated calculations as the court construes any patent claims and the record develops.
A commercial contract dispute becomes an intellectual property damages question when the contract is a license: a patent, trademark, software, or technology license whose royalties were underpaid, a licensee that kept selling after the license ended, or a dispute over the royalty base, the products covered, or the audit rights. The economist reads the license and its royalty provisions, rebuilds the royalty base from the licensee's sales records and any audit findings, and computes the shortfall by period under the contract's own terms. Where a licensee kept using the technology after termination, or an infringement claim is joined with the contract claim, the economist also measures the infringement damages, often a reasonable royalty informed by the license itself, and keeps the contract and infringement measures separate.
New York courts ask whether the methodology behind an expert opinion is generally accepted in the relevant professional community and, separately, whether the economist applied it reliably to the facts of the case; qualification rests on training and experience. Forensic economic methods for lost earnings, household services, and present value are published and long used, so the examination of a damages report usually turns on its inputs and their support in the record. Commercial Contract Dispute cases venued in New York are heard in the Supreme Court (General jurisdiction trial court for major civil cases and felonies; one in each county), the County Court (Outside New York City; felonies and mid-sized civil cases), and the Court of Claims (Claims against New York State), with final appeals to the Court of Appeals. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the Southern District of New York, Eastern District of New York, Northern District of New York, and Western District of New York.
New York applies pure comparative fault in a negligence-based claim, reducing the award in proportion to the plaintiff's share. Interest before judgment runs as of right on a contract claim from the earliest date the damages were incurred and in a wrongful death action from the date of death, while a personal injury award carries interest only from the verdict. Economic damages are not subject to a general statutory limit, and larger future damage awards are converted to structured payments by the court, so the report presents the future stream year by year as well as in present value. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the New York rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on IP Damages or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.