KW Economics prepares intellectual property damages analysis for commercial contract dispute cases venued in Guam: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to Guam damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
A commercial contract dispute becomes an intellectual property damages question when the contract is a license: a patent, trademark, software, or technology license whose royalties were underpaid, a licensee that kept selling after the license ended, or a dispute over the royalty base, the products covered, or the audit rights. The economist reads the license and its royalty provisions, rebuilds the royalty base from the licensee's sales records and any audit findings, and computes the shortfall by period under the contract's own terms. Where a licensee kept using the technology after termination, or an infringement claim is joined with the contract claim, the economist also measures the infringement damages, often a reasonable royalty informed by the license itself, and keeps the contract and infringement measures separate.
Economic analysis and expert testimony on damages in patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret cases and in license and royalty disputes, for the patentee or the accused infringer and for either side of every other claim. The work measures each remedy the governing statute allows: a reasonable royalty and the patentee's lost profits, including price erosion, apportioned to the patented feature; the defendant's profits, the owner's actual damages, and corrective advertising in a trademark case; actual damages and the infringer's profits in a copyright case, where the infringer carries the burden of its deductible expenses and of the profit owed to other factors; and actual loss, unjust enrichment, or a reasonable royalty for a misappropriated trade secret.
The size of the claim depends on the contract's remaining term, the profit margin the business would have realized, and how much of the lost volume was or could have been replaced. Incremental cost treatment is the usual battleground: whether a given cost would have been avoided when the revenue disappeared changes the margin and therefore the loss. For a new venture or a contract without a performance history, the reasonableness of the projected revenue is the central dispute, and the period over which lost profits are claimed is scrutinized against the contract's terms and the market.
Guam's rules of evidence follow the federal model for expert testimony: the court asks whether the economist is qualified, whether the opinion rests on sufficient facts and reliable principles and methods, and whether those methods were reliably applied to the case. An economic damages report answers that inquiry by naming its data sources and tying each input to the record.
Highest court: Supreme Court of Guam.
Federal venues: District Court of Guam.
Guam reduces recovery in proportion to the plaintiff's share of fault in a negligence-based claim, and claims against the government proceed under a separate claims act with its own procedures. The treatment of prejudgment interest on liquidated and unliquidated sums follows Guam's own statutes and case law, which counsel confirm for the specific claim, so the report separates the sums that were due from the amounts that had to be projected. Any limit on economic damages under a particular statute is likewise for counsel to confirm, and the report states each loss as of a fixed date so it can be adjusted to whichever rules apply.
We issue the final report on the disclosure schedule and provide deposition and trial testimony, critique of the opposing damages analysis, and updated calculations as the court construes any patent claims and the record develops.
A commercial contract dispute becomes an intellectual property damages question when the contract is a license: a patent, trademark, software, or technology license whose royalties were underpaid, a licensee that kept selling after the license ended, or a dispute over the royalty base, the products covered, or the audit rights. The economist reads the license and its royalty provisions, rebuilds the royalty base from the licensee's sales records and any audit findings, and computes the shortfall by period under the contract's own terms. Where a licensee kept using the technology after termination, or an infringement claim is joined with the contract claim, the economist also measures the infringement damages, often a reasonable royalty informed by the license itself, and keeps the contract and infringement measures separate.
Guam's rules of evidence follow the federal model for expert testimony: the court asks whether the economist is qualified, whether the opinion rests on sufficient facts and reliable principles and methods, and whether those methods were reliably applied to the case. An economic damages report answers that inquiry by naming its data sources and tying each input to the record. Commercial Contract Dispute cases venued in Guam are heard in the Superior Court of Guam (General jurisdiction trial court for local civil and criminal matters), with final appeals to the Supreme Court of Guam. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the District Court of Guam.
Guam reduces recovery in proportion to the plaintiff's share of fault in a negligence-based claim, and claims against the government proceed under a separate claims act with its own procedures. The treatment of prejudgment interest on liquidated and unliquidated sums follows Guam's own statutes and case law, which counsel confirm for the specific claim, so the report separates the sums that were due from the amounts that had to be projected. Any limit on economic damages under a particular statute is likewise for counsel to confirm, and the report states each loss as of a fixed date so it can be adjusted to whichever rules apply. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the Guam rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on IP Damages or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.