KW Economics prepares life care plan costing for traumatic brain injury cases venued in Alaska: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to Alaska damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
A brain injury life care plan is dominated by attendant care and supervision, therapy, medication, and case management over a lifetime, and its present value is highly sensitive to the daily hours of paid help the plan specifies and the life expectancy applied. The economist carries each item forward with the medical cost growth appropriate to its category, discounts the stream over the life expectancy the medical evidence supports, and presents the total under alternative supervision levels when the plan or the record offers more than one. Every valued item ties back to the plan so counsel and the plan's author can confirm that the valuation reconciles.
Reduction of a life care plan's line items to a single present value. The plan's items, frequencies, durations, and unit costs are carried forward with medical cost growth appropriate to each category, then discounted over the applicable life expectancy. Plan authorship stays with the life care planner; our role is the economic translation of the plan into a damages figure that reconciles with the plan and can be examined item by item.
Two components usually dominate: future lost earnings across a long worklife for a young person, and the present value of attendant care and supervision when the plan calls for daily hours of paid help. Because the level of supervision and the person's residual work capacity are both matters of expert opinion, the report's total is highly sensitive to those inputs, and the life expectancy used for the care stream is a second source of dispute. Mild injury with persistent symptoms presents a narrower claim built on reduced hours, lost advancement, and periodic treatment.
Alaska's trial judges act as gatekeepers for expert testimony and ask whether the economist is qualified by training and experience, whether the method is one the profession has tested and accepted, and whether it was applied reliably to the facts of the case. A damages report meets that inquiry by naming the published source behind every rate and table and tying each assumption to the record.
Highest court: Alaska Supreme Court. Court system: courts.alaska.gov.
Federal venues: District of Alaska.
Outside the civil courts, wage-loss disputes in workers' compensation matters proceed before the Alaska Workers' Compensation Board.
Alaska pairs a wrongful death action, measured by the loss to the surviving spouse, children, or dependents, with a survival action for the decedent's own claims, and when no dependents survive the recovery runs to the estate on a different measure. Collateral-source payments reduce the award after verdict except where the source holds a subrogation right, and prejudgment interest runs on tort awards from a defined accrual point, so the interval between injury and judgment is part of the economic picture.
We issue the final report and provide deposition and trial testimony, rebuttal of opposing present value opinions, and revaluation when the plan is updated.
A brain injury life care plan is dominated by attendant care and supervision, therapy, medication, and case management over a lifetime, and its present value is highly sensitive to the daily hours of paid help the plan specifies and the life expectancy applied. The economist carries each item forward with the medical cost growth appropriate to its category, discounts the stream over the life expectancy the medical evidence supports, and presents the total under alternative supervision levels when the plan or the record offers more than one. Every valued item ties back to the plan so counsel and the plan's author can confirm that the valuation reconciles.
Alaska's trial judges act as gatekeepers for expert testimony and ask whether the economist is qualified by training and experience, whether the method is one the profession has tested and accepted, and whether it was applied reliably to the facts of the case. A damages report meets that inquiry by naming the published source behind every rate and table and tying each assumption to the record. Traumatic Brain Injury cases venued in Alaska are heard in the Superior Court (General jurisdiction trial court; handles all civil and criminal matters), with final appeals to the Alaska Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the District of Alaska.
Alaska pairs a wrongful death action, measured by the loss to the surviving spouse, children, or dependents, with a survival action for the decedent's own claims, and when no dependents survive the recovery runs to the estate on a different measure. Collateral-source payments reduce the award after verdict except where the source holds a subrogation right, and prejudgment interest runs on tort awards from a defined accrual point, so the interval between injury and judgment is part of the economic picture. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the Alaska rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on Life Care Plan Costing or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.