KW Economics prepares life care plan costing for traumatic brain injury cases venued in Texas: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to Texas damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
A brain injury life care plan is dominated by attendant care and supervision, therapy, medication, and case management over a lifetime, and its present value is highly sensitive to the daily hours of paid help the plan specifies and the life expectancy applied. The economist carries each item forward with the medical cost growth appropriate to its category, discounts the stream over the life expectancy the medical evidence supports, and presents the total under alternative supervision levels when the plan or the record offers more than one. Every valued item ties back to the plan so counsel and the plan's author can confirm that the valuation reconciles.
Reduction of a life care plan's line items to a single present value. The plan's items, frequencies, durations, and unit costs are carried forward with medical cost growth appropriate to each category, then discounted over the applicable life expectancy. Plan authorship stays with the life care planner; our role is the economic translation of the plan into a damages figure that reconciles with the plan and can be examined item by item.
Two components usually dominate: future lost earnings across a long worklife for a young person, and the present value of attendant care and supervision when the plan calls for daily hours of paid help. Because the level of supervision and the person's residual work capacity are both matters of expert opinion, the report's total is highly sensitive to those inputs, and the life expectancy used for the care stream is a second source of dispute. Mild injury with persistent symptoms presents a narrower claim built on reduced hours, lost advancement, and periodic treatment.
Texas trial courts act as gatekeepers for expert testimony and ask whether the economist is qualified, whether the method is reliable and accepted in the profession, and whether it was applied to the facts of the case rather than to assumptions the record does not support. A damages report meets that inquiry by stating each assumption and its source so the analytical gap the court looks for is not there.
Highest court: Supreme Court of Texas. Court system: txcourts.gov.
Federal venues: Northern District of Texas, Southern District of Texas, Eastern District of Texas, Western District of Texas.
Outside the civil courts, wage-loss disputes in workers' compensation matters proceed before the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation.
Texas pairs a wrongful death action for the surviving spouse, children, and parents with a survival action for the estate's own claims, and the recovery of medical expenses is limited to the amounts actually paid or incurred rather than the amounts billed. Recovery is barred once the plaintiff's responsibility exceeds half, statutory limits apply to noneconomic damages in health care liability claims while economic damages are unlimited, and prejudgment interest accrues on past damages from a defined point after the defendant receives notice of the claim but is not awarded on future damages.
We issue the final report and provide deposition and trial testimony, rebuttal of opposing present value opinions, and revaluation when the plan is updated.
The same four steps apply to a traumatic brain injury case venued in Texas; the damages framework above decides which components enter the total. Establish the but-for earnings path from the person's history or, for a young person, from occupational data for the path they were on. Draw the post-injury path from actual earnings and the work-capacity opinions in the record, and measure the earnings gap over the remaining worklife. Value household services and family supervision from time-use data and local rates, and price the care plan item by item with medical cost growth. Discount every future stream to present value at a stated rate and show the total under each supervision and work-capacity scenario.
Texas trial courts act as gatekeepers for expert testimony and ask whether the economist is qualified, whether the method is reliable and accepted in the profession, and whether it was applied to the facts of the case rather than to assumptions the record does not support. A damages report meets that inquiry by stating each assumption and its source so the analytical gap the court looks for is not there. Traumatic Brain Injury cases venued in Texas are heard in the District Court (General jurisdiction; civil cases above the justice court threshold, felonies, domestic relations) and the County Court at Law (Statutory courts; mid-sized civil cases, misdemeanors), with final appeals to the Supreme Court of Texas. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the Northern District of Texas, Southern District of Texas, Eastern District of Texas, and Western District of Texas.
Texas pairs a wrongful death action for the surviving spouse, children, and parents with a survival action for the estate's own claims, and the recovery of medical expenses is limited to the amounts actually paid or incurred rather than the amounts billed. Recovery is barred once the plaintiff's responsibility exceeds half, statutory limits apply to noneconomic damages in health care liability claims while economic damages are unlimited, and prejudgment interest accrues on past damages from a defined point after the defendant receives notice of the claim but is not awarded on future damages. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the Texas rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on Life Care Plan Costing or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.