KW Economics prepares life care plan costing for traumatic brain injury cases venued in Montana: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to Montana damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
A brain injury life care plan is dominated by attendant care and supervision, therapy, medication, and case management over a lifetime, and its present value is highly sensitive to the daily hours of paid help the plan specifies and the life expectancy applied. The economist carries each item forward with the medical cost growth appropriate to its category, discounts the stream over the life expectancy the medical evidence supports, and presents the total under alternative supervision levels when the plan or the record offers more than one. Every valued item ties back to the plan so counsel and the plan's author can confirm that the valuation reconciles.
Reduction of a life care plan's line items to a single present value. The plan's items, frequencies, durations, and unit costs are carried forward with medical cost growth appropriate to each category, then discounted over the applicable life expectancy. Plan authorship stays with the life care planner; our role is the economic translation of the plan into a damages figure that reconciles with the plan and can be examined item by item.
Two components usually dominate: future lost earnings across a long worklife for a young person, and the present value of attendant care and supervision when the plan calls for daily hours of paid help. Because the level of supervision and the person's residual work capacity are both matters of expert opinion, the report's total is highly sensitive to those inputs, and the life expectancy used for the care stream is a second source of dispute. Mild injury with persistent symptoms presents a narrower claim built on reduced hours, lost advancement, and periodic treatment.
Montana courts apply a reliability inquiry to novel scientific evidence and otherwise ask whether the economist is qualified by training and experience and whether the opinion will help the fact finder, leaving the weight of the testimony to cross-examination. An economic damages report is therefore examined on its inputs: whether each rate, table, and assumption traces to the record and to a published source.
Highest court: Montana Supreme Court. Court system: courts.mt.gov.
Federal venues: District of Montana.
Outside the civil courts, wage-loss disputes in workers' compensation matters proceed before the Montana Department of Labor and Industry, Employment Relations Division.
Montana pairs a wrongful death action for the heirs' losses with a survival action in which the estate may recover the decedent's lost future earnings net of personal consumption, with the two claims coordinated to avoid double recovery. Recovery is barred once the plaintiff's fault exceeds the combined fault of the defendants, larger awards are reduced after verdict by collateral-source payments that carry no reimbursement right, and prejudgment interest is generally limited to sums that were certain when the loss occurred.
We issue the final report and provide deposition and trial testimony, rebuttal of opposing present value opinions, and revaluation when the plan is updated.
A brain injury life care plan is dominated by attendant care and supervision, therapy, medication, and case management over a lifetime, and its present value is highly sensitive to the daily hours of paid help the plan specifies and the life expectancy applied. The economist carries each item forward with the medical cost growth appropriate to its category, discounts the stream over the life expectancy the medical evidence supports, and presents the total under alternative supervision levels when the plan or the record offers more than one. Every valued item ties back to the plan so counsel and the plan's author can confirm that the valuation reconciles.
Montana courts apply a reliability inquiry to novel scientific evidence and otherwise ask whether the economist is qualified by training and experience and whether the opinion will help the fact finder, leaving the weight of the testimony to cross-examination. An economic damages report is therefore examined on its inputs: whether each rate, table, and assumption traces to the record and to a published source. Traumatic Brain Injury cases venued in Montana are heard in the District Court (General jurisdiction; one district in each of 56 counties), with final appeals to the Montana Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the District of Montana.
Montana pairs a wrongful death action for the heirs' losses with a survival action in which the estate may recover the decedent's lost future earnings net of personal consumption, with the two claims coordinated to avoid double recovery. Recovery is barred once the plaintiff's fault exceeds the combined fault of the defendants, larger awards are reduced after verdict by collateral-source payments that carry no reimbursement right, and prejudgment interest is generally limited to sums that were certain when the loss occurred. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the Montana rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on Life Care Plan Costing or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.