KW Economics prepares economic damages analyses for employment discrimination cases venued in Montana: the components the loss claim consists of, the records that drive them, and a present value built to Montana's damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
An employment discrimination economic claim measures the gap between the compensation the employee would have received absent the adverse action and the compensation actually received, as back pay, front pay, and lost benefits net of mitigation. Read the full employment discrimination analysis guide.
Montana courts apply a reliability inquiry to novel scientific evidence and otherwise ask whether the economist is qualified by training and experience and whether the opinion will help the fact finder, leaving the weight of the testimony to cross-examination. An economic damages report is therefore examined on its inputs: whether each rate, table, and assumption traces to the record and to a published source.
Highest court: Montana Supreme Court. Federal venues: D. Mont. Court system: courts.mt.gov.
Montana reduces a negligence-based award by the plaintiff's share of fault and bars recovery once that share exceeds the combined fault of the defendants. Prejudgment interest is generally limited to sums that were certain when the loss occurred, which favors a liquidated contract balance over a projected loss. Economic damages are not subject to a general statutory limit outside specific statutory claims, and the report identifies the components that were certain when they accrued and states the projected components as of a fixed date.
The same four steps apply to an employment discrimination case venued in Montana; the damages framework above decides which components enter the total.
Employment Discrimination cases venued in Montana are heard in the District Court (General jurisdiction; one district in each of 56 counties). Final appeals run to the Montana Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the United States District Court for the District of Montana.
Montana reduces a negligence-based award by the plaintiff's share of fault and bars recovery once that share exceeds the combined fault of the defendants. Prejudgment interest is generally limited to sums that were certain when the loss occurred, which favors a liquidated contract balance over a projected loss. Economic damages are not subject to a general statutory limit outside specific statutory claims, and the report identifies the components that were certain when they accrued and states the projected components as of a fixed date. Montana courts apply a reliability inquiry to novel scientific evidence and otherwise ask whether the economist is qualified by training and experience and whether the opinion will help the fact finder, leaving the weight of the testimony to cross-examination. An economic damages report is therefore examined on its inputs: whether each rate, table, and assumption traces to the record and to a published source.
Request a consultation on employment discrimination cases in Montana or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.