Medical Malpractice Economic Damages Expert in Montana

By Christopher Skerritt, M.Ed., MBA, Chief of Economic Services · Published · Reviewed

KW Economics prepares economic damages analyses for medical malpractice cases venued in Montana: the components the loss claim consists of, the records that drive them, and a present value built to Montana's damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.

A medical malpractice economic claim measures the earnings, benefits, household services, and care costs the injury added to the outcome the patient would have had with proper care, as the causation opinions in the record define it. Read the full medical malpractice analysis guide.

Montana courts and expert standards

Montana courts apply a reliability inquiry to novel scientific evidence and otherwise ask whether the economist is qualified by training and experience and whether the opinion will help the fact finder, leaving the weight of the testimony to cross-examination. An economic damages report is therefore examined on its inputs: whether each rate, table, and assumption traces to the record and to a published source.

Where these cases are heard

Highest court: Montana Supreme Court. Federal venues: D. Mont. Court system: courts.mt.gov.

Outside the civil courts, wage-loss disputes in workers' compensation matters proceed before the Montana Department of Labor and Industry, Employment Relations Division.

Damages framework

Montana pairs a wrongful death action for the heirs' losses with a survival action in which the estate may recover the decedent's lost future earnings net of personal consumption, with the two claims coordinated to avoid double recovery. Recovery is barred once the plaintiff's fault exceeds the combined fault of the defendants, larger awards are reduced after verdict by collateral-source payments that carry no reimbursement right, and prejudgment interest is generally limited to sums that were certain when the loss occurred.

How the analysis is built

The same four steps apply to a medical malpractice case venued in Montana; the damages framework above decides which components enter the total.

  1. State the but-for path the causation opinions support: what the patient would have earned, for how long, and what care the underlying condition would have required regardless.
  2. Build the injured path from actual post-injury earnings, the work-capacity opinions, and the incremental care plan.
  3. Measure each component as the difference between the two paths, projected over the applicable life or worklife expectancy with stated growth.
  4. Discount the streams to present value and present the loss under each apportionment or life expectancy scenario the physicians offer.

Attorney guides for medical malpractice cases

Other case types in Montana

Frequently asked: medical malpractice cases in Montana

Which Montana courts hear medical malpractice cases?

Medical Malpractice cases venued in Montana are heard in the District Court (General jurisdiction; one district in each of 56 counties). Final appeals run to the Montana Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the United States District Court for the District of Montana.

How does Montana's damages framework shape the economic analysis?

Montana pairs a wrongful death action for the heirs' losses with a survival action in which the estate may recover the decedent's lost future earnings net of personal consumption, with the two claims coordinated to avoid double recovery. Recovery is barred once the plaintiff's fault exceeds the combined fault of the defendants, larger awards are reduced after verdict by collateral-source payments that carry no reimbursement right, and prejudgment interest is generally limited to sums that were certain when the loss occurred. Montana courts apply a reliability inquiry to novel scientific evidence and otherwise ask whether the economist is qualified by training and experience and whether the opinion will help the fact finder, leaving the weight of the testimony to cross-examination. An economic damages report is therefore examined on its inputs: whether each rate, table, and assumption traces to the record and to a published source.

More questions about medical malpractice analysis

References

Request a consultation on medical malpractice cases in Montana or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.