KW Economics prepares business valuation for partnership and shareholder dispute cases venued in Montana: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to Montana damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
In a partnership or shareholder dispute the valuation turns on the valuation date, the standard of value, and any buyout formula in the operating or shareholder agreement. The economist reviews the agreements to fix those terms, normalizes the financial statements for owner compensation, related-party transactions, and non-recurring items, and values the interest using the income, market, and asset approaches as the facts support. Because a fair value standard may exclude the minority and marketability discounts that fair market value applies, the report states the standard used and can show the result under the alternative so the difference is quantified rather than argued.
Valuation of closely held businesses and ownership interests for shareholder and partnership disputes, divorce, estate and gift matters, and buy-sell disagreements. The work applies the income, market, and asset approaches under the standard of value that governs the matter, addresses discounts for lack of control and marketability where they apply, and documents every input so the conclusion can be tested on cross-examination.
The valuation date and the standard of value control the result: a fair value standard may exclude the minority and marketability discounts that a fair market value standard applies, and the gap between the two can be substantial for a minority interest in a closely held company. Normalizing adjustments to owner compensation and related-party dealings often decide whether the business shows earnings to value at all. Where the claim includes diverted profits, the amount depends on how far back the records permit reconstruction and on whether the business's actual results can be separated from market conditions.
Montana courts apply a reliability inquiry to novel scientific evidence and otherwise ask whether the economist is qualified by training and experience and whether the opinion will help the fact finder, leaving the weight of the testimony to cross-examination. An economic damages report is therefore examined on its inputs: whether each rate, table, and assumption traces to the record and to a published source.
Highest court: Montana Supreme Court. Court system: courts.mt.gov.
Federal venues: District of Montana.
Montana reduces a negligence-based award by the plaintiff's share of fault and bars recovery once that share exceeds the combined fault of the defendants. Prejudgment interest is generally limited to sums that were certain when the loss occurred, which favors a liquidated contract balance over a projected loss. Economic damages are not subject to a general statutory limit outside specific statutory claims, and the report identifies the components that were certain when they accrued and states the projected components as of a fixed date.
We issue the final report and provide deposition and trial testimony and critique of opposing valuation reports.
In a partnership or shareholder dispute the valuation turns on the valuation date, the standard of value, and any buyout formula in the operating or shareholder agreement. The economist reviews the agreements to fix those terms, normalizes the financial statements for owner compensation, related-party transactions, and non-recurring items, and values the interest using the income, market, and asset approaches as the facts support. Because a fair value standard may exclude the minority and marketability discounts that fair market value applies, the report states the standard used and can show the result under the alternative so the difference is quantified rather than argued.
Montana courts apply a reliability inquiry to novel scientific evidence and otherwise ask whether the economist is qualified by training and experience and whether the opinion will help the fact finder, leaving the weight of the testimony to cross-examination. An economic damages report is therefore examined on its inputs: whether each rate, table, and assumption traces to the record and to a published source. Partnership and Shareholder Dispute cases venued in Montana are heard in the District Court (General jurisdiction; one district in each of 56 counties), with final appeals to the Montana Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the District of Montana.
Montana reduces a negligence-based award by the plaintiff's share of fault and bars recovery once that share exceeds the combined fault of the defendants. Prejudgment interest is generally limited to sums that were certain when the loss occurred, which favors a liquidated contract balance over a projected loss. Economic damages are not subject to a general statutory limit outside specific statutory claims, and the report identifies the components that were certain when they accrued and states the projected components as of a fixed date. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the Montana rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on Business Valuation or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.