KW Economics prepares life care plan costing for medical malpractice cases venued in Alabama: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to Alabama damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
In a medical malpractice matter the life care plan often distinguishes the incremental care the injury requires from the care the underlying condition would have required anyway, and the present value must respect that line. The economist values the incremental items only, applies category-specific medical cost growth, and discounts the stream over the life expectancy the medical evidence supports, which may already have been reduced by the condition being treated. Where the physicians disagree on life expectancy or on which items are incremental, the report presents the present value under each scenario so the fact finder can attach the number to its finding.
Reduction of a life care plan's line items to a single present value. The plan's items, frequencies, durations, and unit costs are carried forward with medical cost growth appropriate to each category, then discounted over the applicable life expectancy. Plan authorship stays with the life care planner; our role is the economic translation of the plan into a damages figure that reconciles with the plan and can be examined item by item.
Because the underlying condition often affected work capacity or life expectancy on its own, the apportionment between the injury and the pre-existing condition is usually the most contested assumption and the one that most changes the total. In cases of permanent disability the incremental care costs and the earnings loss are both large and run across a long horizon, and the life expectancy used for each stream is a second point of contention. In delayed-diagnosis cases the loss may be measured as the difference between two outcome paths, each with its own earnings and care profile.
Alabama applies a reliability inquiry to scientific evidence and asks of other expert testimony whether the witness is qualified by training and experience and whether the opinion will assist the jury, so an economic damages opinion is tested mainly on its inputs: whether each rate, table, and assumption traces to the record and to a published source.
Highest court: Supreme Court of Alabama. Court system: alacourt.gov.
Federal venues: Northern District of Alabama, Middle District of Alabama, Southern District of Alabama.
Outside the civil courts, wage-loss disputes in workers' compensation matters proceed before the Alabama Department of Labor, Workers' Compensation Division.
Alabama measures wrongful death differently from most states: the recovery is punitive in character rather than a computation of the survivors' pecuniary loss, so the economist's projection of the decedent's earnings plays a narrower role than in a personal injury claim, where lost earnings and household services are measured in the usual way. Alabama retains contributory negligence, evidence that medical expenses were paid by insurance or other sources is admissible, a departure from the strict collateral source rule, and prejudgment interest is generally not awarded on unliquidated tort damages.
We issue the final report and provide deposition and trial testimony, rebuttal of opposing present value opinions, and revaluation when the plan is updated.
In a medical malpractice matter the life care plan often distinguishes the incremental care the injury requires from the care the underlying condition would have required anyway, and the present value must respect that line. The economist values the incremental items only, applies category-specific medical cost growth, and discounts the stream over the life expectancy the medical evidence supports, which may already have been reduced by the condition being treated. Where the physicians disagree on life expectancy or on which items are incremental, the report presents the present value under each scenario so the fact finder can attach the number to its finding.
Alabama applies a reliability inquiry to scientific evidence and asks of other expert testimony whether the witness is qualified by training and experience and whether the opinion will assist the jury, so an economic damages opinion is tested mainly on its inputs: whether each rate, table, and assumption traces to the record and to a published source. Medical Malpractice cases venued in Alabama are heard in the Circuit Court (General jurisdiction trial court; hears larger civil cases and all felony criminal cases), with final appeals to the Supreme Court of Alabama. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the Northern District of Alabama, Middle District of Alabama, and Southern District of Alabama.
Alabama measures wrongful death differently from most states: the recovery is punitive in character rather than a computation of the survivors' pecuniary loss, so the economist's projection of the decedent's earnings plays a narrower role than in a personal injury claim, where lost earnings and household services are measured in the usual way. Alabama retains contributory negligence, evidence that medical expenses were paid by insurance or other sources is admissible, a departure from the strict collateral source rule, and prejudgment interest is generally not awarded on unliquidated tort damages. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the Alabama rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on Life Care Plan Costing or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.