KW Economics prepares life care plan costing for medical malpractice cases venued in Indiana: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to Indiana damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
In a medical malpractice matter the life care plan often distinguishes the incremental care the injury requires from the care the underlying condition would have required anyway, and the present value must respect that line. The economist values the incremental items only, applies category-specific medical cost growth, and discounts the stream over the life expectancy the medical evidence supports, which may already have been reduced by the condition being treated. Where the physicians disagree on life expectancy or on which items are incremental, the report presents the present value under each scenario so the fact finder can attach the number to its finding.
Reduction of a life care plan's line items to a single present value. The plan's items, frequencies, durations, and unit costs are carried forward with medical cost growth appropriate to each category, then discounted over the applicable life expectancy. Plan authorship stays with the life care planner; our role is the economic translation of the plan into a damages figure that reconciles with the plan and can be examined item by item.
Because the underlying condition often affected work capacity or life expectancy on its own, the apportionment between the injury and the pre-existing condition is usually the most contested assumption and the one that most changes the total. In cases of permanent disability the incremental care costs and the earnings loss are both large and run across a long horizon, and the life expectancy used for each stream is a second point of contention. In delayed-diagnosis cases the loss may be measured as the difference between two outcome paths, each with its own earnings and care profile.
Indiana courts require that the principles behind expert scientific testimony be reliable and treat the federal reliability factors as helpful rather than controlling; for economic damages testimony the inquiry is whether the witness is qualified and whether the method and its inputs rest on a sound basis. A report that names its sources and ties each assumption to the record meets that standard.
Highest court: Indiana Supreme Court. Court system: in.gov.
Federal venues: Northern District of Indiana, Southern District of Indiana.
Outside the civil courts, wage-loss disputes in workers' compensation matters proceed before the Worker's Compensation Board of Indiana.
Indiana's wrongful death remedies differ by who died: the general act measures the loss to a spouse or dependents, a separate act covers adults without dependents with limited nonpecuniary recovery, and a child act covers minors, so the economist's role depends on which act applies. Recovery is barred once the plaintiff's fault exceeds half, the jury may hear evidence of collateral-source payments other than insurance the plaintiff or family paid for and governmental benefits, and prejudgment interest in tort turns on a statutory settlement-offer procedure.
We issue the final report and provide deposition and trial testimony, rebuttal of opposing present value opinions, and revaluation when the plan is updated.
In a medical malpractice matter the life care plan often distinguishes the incremental care the injury requires from the care the underlying condition would have required anyway, and the present value must respect that line. The economist values the incremental items only, applies category-specific medical cost growth, and discounts the stream over the life expectancy the medical evidence supports, which may already have been reduced by the condition being treated. Where the physicians disagree on life expectancy or on which items are incremental, the report presents the present value under each scenario so the fact finder can attach the number to its finding.
Indiana courts require that the principles behind expert scientific testimony be reliable and treat the federal reliability factors as helpful rather than controlling; for economic damages testimony the inquiry is whether the witness is qualified and whether the method and its inputs rest on a sound basis. A report that names its sources and ties each assumption to the record meets that standard. Medical Malpractice cases venued in Indiana are heard in the Circuit Court (General jurisdiction; oldest courts in each county) and the Superior Court (General jurisdiction; exists in most counties alongside circuit courts), with final appeals to the Indiana Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the Northern District of Indiana and Southern District of Indiana.
Indiana's wrongful death remedies differ by who died: the general act measures the loss to a spouse or dependents, a separate act covers adults without dependents with limited nonpecuniary recovery, and a child act covers minors, so the economist's role depends on which act applies. Recovery is barred once the plaintiff's fault exceeds half, the jury may hear evidence of collateral-source payments other than insurance the plaintiff or family paid for and governmental benefits, and prejudgment interest in tort turns on a statutory settlement-offer procedure. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the Indiana rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on Life Care Plan Costing or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.