KW Economics prepares employment damages analysis for wrongful termination cases venued in Arkansas: what the loss claim consists of, the records that drive it, and a present value built to Arkansas damages rules and venues. Plaintiff and defense.
A wrongful termination analysis asks what the employee lost when the employment ended and how much of that loss has been or should be replaced by other work. The economist builds the but-for compensation path from the employment agreement, pay history, and the employer's pay and promotion practices, including the benefit and pension accruals that would have continued, and compares it with the replacement earnings actually received. Front pay is projected over the period the record supports for reaching comparable employment, pension and deferred compensation losses are calculated from the plan terms, equity losses from the award schedule, and the future components are discounted to present value.
Back pay, front pay, and lost benefits in discrimination, retaliation, wrongful termination, and wage-and-hour matters. The analysis reconstructs what the employee would have earned in the position, including raises, bonuses, and benefit accruals, measures actual interim earnings, and evaluates mitigation and the period over which front pay is reasonable. In wage-and-hour matters the same records drive an hours and pay reconstruction for the individual claim or the class.
The most contested component is usually the front pay period, because the employee's age, occupation, and local market determine how quickly comparable work is reasonably available. For long-tenured employees, the loss of accrued pension benefits and retiree health coverage can rival the pay loss, and for employees with equity compensation the unvested awards forfeited at termination can be the largest single item. Where the employee found comparable work quickly, the claim may reduce to a documented back pay figure with small benefit differences.
Arkansas trial courts act as gatekeepers and ask whether the economist's method is reliable, whether it has been tested and accepted in the profession, and whether it fits the facts of the case, with qualification resting on training and experience. A report that states its assumptions and cites its data sources answers those questions on its face.
Highest court: Arkansas Supreme Court. Court system: courts.arkansas.gov.
Federal venues: Eastern District of Arkansas, Western District of Arkansas.
Arkansas reduces a negligence-based award by the plaintiff's share of fault and bars recovery only when that share equals or exceeds the defendants', and the state constitution bars limits on the amount recoverable for injury or death. Prejudgment interest is available where the amount of the loss was determinable at the time of the injury, which favors a liquidated contract sum over a projected loss. No general statutory limit applies to economic damages, and the report separates the components that were determinable at the time of the loss from those that had to be projected.
We issue the final report and provide deposition and trial testimony, rebuttal of opposing damages opinions, and updated calculations as the trial date moves.
A wrongful termination analysis asks what the employee lost when the employment ended and how much of that loss has been or should be replaced by other work. The economist builds the but-for compensation path from the employment agreement, pay history, and the employer's pay and promotion practices, including the benefit and pension accruals that would have continued, and compares it with the replacement earnings actually received. Front pay is projected over the period the record supports for reaching comparable employment, pension and deferred compensation losses are calculated from the plan terms, equity losses from the award schedule, and the future components are discounted to present value.
Arkansas trial courts act as gatekeepers and ask whether the economist's method is reliable, whether it has been tested and accepted in the profession, and whether it fits the facts of the case, with qualification resting on training and experience. A report that states its assumptions and cites its data sources answers those questions on its face. Wrongful Termination cases venued in Arkansas are heard in the Circuit Court (General jurisdiction; civil, criminal, domestic, probate, and juvenile matters), with final appeals to the Arkansas Supreme Court. Matters within federal jurisdiction proceed in the Eastern District of Arkansas and Western District of Arkansas.
Arkansas reduces a negligence-based award by the plaintiff's share of fault and bars recovery only when that share equals or exceeds the defendants', and the state constitution bars limits on the amount recoverable for injury or death. Prejudgment interest is available where the amount of the loss was determinable at the time of the injury, which favors a liquidated contract sum over a projected loss. No general statutory limit applies to economic damages, and the report separates the components that were determinable at the time of the loss from those that had to be projected. The report presents past and future amounts separately, states every rate and table with its source, and shows the result under the alternatives the other side is likely to argue, so counsel can apply the Arkansas rules to a documented figure.
Request a consultation on Employment Damages or call (201) 343-0700. Plaintiff and defense counsel.